The Locator -- [(subject = "Privacy Right of")]

2315 records matched your query       


Record 18 | Previous Record | MARC Display | Next Record | Search Results
Author:
Privacy (John Wiley & Sons)
Title:
Privacy / edited by Steven M. Cahn and Carissa Veliz.
Publisher:
John Wiley & SonsInc.,
Copyright Date:
2023
Description:
xii, 196 pages ; 24 cm.
Subject:
Privacy, Right of.
Privacy, Right of.
Other Authors:
Cahn, Steven M., editor.
Veliz, Carissa, editor.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents:
The right to privacy / Judith Jarvis Thomson -- Thomson on privacy / Thomas Scanlon -- Why privacy is important / James Rachels -- Privacy and the limits of law / Ruth Gavison -- Privacy, morality, and the law / W.A. Parent -- Concealment and exposure / Thomas Nagel -- The liberal value of privacy / Boudewign de Bruin -- What is the right to privacy? / Andrei Marmor -- Privacy rights and public information / Benedict Rumbold and James Wilson -- Privacy and the importance of 'getting away with it' / Cressida Gaukroger -- Privacy in social media / Andrei Marmor -- Governing privacy / Carissa Veliz.
Summary:
"Perhaps the most striking thing about the right to privacy is that nobody seems to have any very clear idea what it is. Consider, for example, the familiar proposal that the right to privacy is the right "to be let alone." On the one hand, this doesn't seem to take in enough. The police might say, "We grant we used a special X-ray device on Smith, so as to be able to watch him through the walls of his house; we grant we trained an amplifying device on him so as to be able to hear everything he said; but we let him strictly alone: we didn't touch him, we didn't even go near him-our devices operate at a distance." Anyone who believes there is a right to privacy would presumably believe that it has been violated in Smith's case; yet he would be hard put to ex-plain precisely how, if the right to privacy is the right to be let alone. And on the other hand, this account of the right to privacy lets in far too much. If I hit Jones on the head with a brick I have not let him alone. Yet, while hitting Jones on the head with a brick is surely violating some right of Jones', doing it should surely not turn out to violate his right to privacy. Else, where is this to end? Is every violation of a right a violation of the right to privacy? It seems best to be less ambitious, to begin with at least. I suggest, then, that we look at some specific, imaginary cases in which people would say, "There, in that case, the right to privacy has been violated," and ask ourselves precisely why this would be said, and what, if anything, would justify saying it"-- Provided by publisher.
Series:
Wiley Blackwell readings in philosophy ; 16
ISBN:
1119932556
9781119932550
OCLC:
(OCoLC)1341845656
LCCN:
2022032868
Locations:
OVUX522 -- University of Iowa Libraries (Iowa City)

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.