11 records matched your query
04105aam a2200433 i 4500 001 DDC396CAEE0211ECABFB385646ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20220617010046 008 210617t20222022enk b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2021029835 020 $a 1108440061 020 $a 9781108440066 020 $a 1108424325 020 $a 9781108424325 035 $a (OCoLC)1252049904 040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d OCLCF $d UKMGB $d OCLCO $d YDX $d WLL $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a KF4755 $b .B7577 2022 100 1 $a Brooks, Roy L. $q (Roy Lavon), $d 1950- $e author. 245 10 $a Diversity judgments : $b democratizing judicial legitimacy / $c Roy L. Brooks, University of San Diego School of Law. 264 1 $a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2022. 300 $a xix, 636 pages ; $c 24 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 505 0 $a Introduction : the framework -- Matal v. Tam (trademarking racial slurs) -- Lau v. Nichols (bilingual education) -- Brown v. Board of Education (single race schools) -- Griggs v. Duke Power (employment discrimination) -- District of Columbia v. Heller (The Right to Keep and Bear Arms) -- Roe v. Wade (Reproductive Rights) -- United States v. Virginia (single sex colleges) -- United States v. Morrison (violence against women) -- Kulko v. Superior Court (child custody or support) -- Hernandez v. State of Texas (equal protection) -- San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (school financing) -- Plyler v. Doe (educating undocumented minors) -- Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl (Indian adoption) -- Obergefell v. Hodges (same-sex marriages) -- Bostock v. Clayton County (employment discrimination) -- EEOC v. Catastrophe Management Solutions Co. (dreadlocks) -- Kelo v. City of New London (eminent domain) -- SFFA v. Harvard (affirmative action) -- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. (employment discrimination) -- City of Atlanta v. Rolfe (law enforcement) -- Gideon v. Wainwright (right to counsel) -- Martin v. City of Boise (the homeless) -- Citizens United v. FEC (campaign financing) -- Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project (Muslim immigration). 520 $a "The US Supreme Court's legitimacy-its diminishing integrity and contribution to the good of society-is being questioned today like no other time in recent memory. Criticisms reflect the perspectives of both 'insiders' (straight white males) and 'outsiders' (mainly people of color, women, and the LGBTQ community). Neither perspective digs deep enough to get at the root of the Court's legitimacy problem, which is one of process. The Court's process of decision-making is antiquated and out of sync with a society that looks and thinks nothing like the America of the eighteenth century, when the process was first implemented. The current process marginalizes many Americans who have a right to feel disenfranchised. Leading scholar of jurisprudence Roy L. Brooks demonstrates how the Court can modernize and democratize its deliberative process, to be more inclusive of the values and life experiences of Americans who are not straight white males." -- $c publisher's website 650 0 $a Discrimination $x Cases. $z United States $x Cases. 650 0 $a Minorities $x Cases. $z United States $x Cases. 650 0 $a Social justice $z United States $x Cases. 650 6 $a Justice sociale $z Etats-Unis $x Jurisprudence. 650 7 $a Discrimination $x Law and legislation. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00894991 650 7 $a Minorities $x Legal status, laws, etc. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01023189 650 7 $a Social justice. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01122603 651 7 $a United States. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 655 7 $a Trials, litigation, etc. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01423712 776 08 $i Online version: $a Brooks, Roy L. (Roy Lavon), 1950- $t Diversity judgments $d Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2021 $z 9781108333894 $w (DLC) 2021029836 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20230517010459.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=DDC396CAEE0211ECABFB385646ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search