16 records matched your query
02886aam a2200433Ii 4500 001 B4CBE6EC580511E8A8F83C5097128E48 003 SILO 005 20180515010114 008 170731s2017 enk b 000 0 eng d 020 $a 9780854902279 020 $a 0854902279 035 $a (OCoLC)996433473 040 $a YDX $b eng $e rda $c YDX $d HVL $d OCLCF $d NLE $d FIE $d OCLCO $d GUL $d SILO 043 $a s-bl--- $a n-us--- $a s-bl--- 050 4 $a K574 $b .R59 2017 082 04 $a 341.522 $2 23 100 1 $a Amaral, Guilherme Rizzo. 245 10 $a Judicial precedent and arbitration--are arbitrators bound by judicial precedent? : $b a comparative study of UK, US and Brazilian law and practice / $c Guilherme Rizzo Amaral. 264 1 $a London : $b Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing, $c [2017] 300 $a xxiii, 180 pages ; $c 24 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 164-180). 520 $a One of the cornerstones of arbitration is the finality of arbitral awards. Saving rare exceptions, arbitral awards cannot be subject to challenges based on the arbitrator's errors of law. Furthermore, there is no hierarchy between arbitral tribunals and judicial courts, nor are arbitrators part of any judicial system. Thus, if arbitrators are not part of any hierarchical scheme and if there is no challenge or appeal available against their errors of law, how could one say that arbitrators have a duty to follow judicial precedents? Besides, when individuals agree to solve their disputes outside the judicial arena, should they expect a private arbitrator to abide by the same standards of a system they have just avoided? Is the choice for arbitration not a choice for an entirely different legal system, unbound by the so called judge-made law? This book attempts to answer those questions by presenting a comprehensive guide to the relation between judicial precedents and arbitration in the United States, the United Kingdom and in Brazil, as well as in international arbitration as a whole.-- $c Provided by Publisher. 650 0 $a Dispute resolution (Law) $z Great Britain. 650 0 $a Dispute resolution (Law) $z United States. 650 0 $a Dispute resolution (Law) $z Brazil. 650 0 $a Stare decisis $z Great Britain. 650 0 $a Stare decisis $z United States. 650 0 $a Stare decisis $z Brazil. 650 0 $a Arbitration and award $z Great Britain. 650 0 $a Arbitration and award $z United States. 650 0 $a Arbitration and award $z Brazil. 650 0 $a Comparative law. 650 7 $a Arbitration and award. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00812768 650 7 $a Comparative law. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00871350 650 7 $a Dispute resolution (Law) $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00895372 650 7 $a Stare decisis. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01131613 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20191211025330.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=B4CBE6EC580511E8A8F83C5097128E48Initiate Another SILO Locator Search