The Locator -- [(subject = "Right to be forgotten")]

13 records matched your query       


Record 12 | Previous Record | Long Display | Next Record
03453aam a2200469 i 4500
001 5EA7CBBC8B8A11E6A6C758ADDAD10320
003 SILO
005 20161006010101
008 151112t20162016nyu      b    001 0 eng c
010    $a 2015043578
020    $a 1479881708
020    $a 9781479881703
035    $a (OCoLC)928968345
040    $a YLS $b eng $e rda $c YLS $d DLC $d YDXCP $d BTCTA $d OCLCF $d BDX $d CDX $d NYP $d VP@ $d CLU $d MXSCJ $d RID $d CHVBK $d DEBBG $d SILO
042    $a pcc
043    $a e------ $a e------
050 00 $a K3264 C65 J66 2016
100 1  $a Jones, Meg Leta, $e author.
245 10 $a Ctrl + Z : $b the right to be forgotten / $c Meg Leta Jones.
246 1  $a Ctrl plus Z
246 30 $a Right to be forgotten
263    $a 1603
264  1 $a New York ; $b New York University Press, $c [2016]
300    $a xiii, 267 pages ; $c 24 cm
504    $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 233-252) and index.
520 8  $a "This is going on your permanent record!" is a threat that has never held more weight than it does in the Internet Age, when information lasts indefinitely. The ability to make good on that threat is as democratized as posting a Tweet or making a blog. Data about us is created, shared, collected, analyzed, and processed at an overwhelming scale. The damage caused can be severe, affecting relationships, employment, academic success, and any number of other opportunitieśand it can also be long lasting. One possible solution to this threat? A digital right to be forgotten, which would in turn create a legal duty to delete, hide, or anonymize information at the request of another user. The highly controversial right has been criticized as a repugnant affront to principles of expression and access, as unworkable as a technical measure, and as effective as trying to put the cat back in the bag. Ctrl+Z breaks down the debate and provides guidance for a way forward. It argues that the existing perspectives are too limited, offering easy forgetting or none at all. By looking at new theories of privacy and organizing the many potential applications of the right, law and technology scholar Meg Leta Jones offers a set of nuanced choices. To help us choose, she provides a digital information life cycle, reflects on particular legal cultures, and analyzes international interoperability. In the end, the right to be forgotten can be innovative, liberating, and globally viable--Publisher description.
505 0  $a Forgetting made easy -- Forgetting made impossible -- Innovating privacy -- Digital information stewardship -- Ctrl + Z in legal cultures -- Ctrl + Z in the international community.
530    $a Also available as an e-book.
650  0 $a Right to be forgotten $z United States.
650  0 $a Right to be forgotten $z Europe.
650  0 $a Privacy, Right of $z United States.
650  0 $a Privacy, Right of $z Europe.
610 27 $a Europa˜ische Union. $0 (DE-588)5098525-5 $2 gnd
856    $u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028819122&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA $z Inhaltsverzeichnis
941    $a 5
952    $l PLAX964 $d 20230718092553.0
952    $l PNAX964 $d 20200829013849.0
952    $l USUX851 $d 20200806023401.0
952    $l OVUX522 $d 20191213015823.0
952    $l UQAX771 $d 20161115071230.0
956    $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=5EA7CBBC8B8A11E6A6C758ADDAD10320
994    $a C0 $b IWA

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.