582 records matched your query
01903aam a2200325Ii 4500 001 FC07DDDC3F1711E98434DF6697128E48 003 SILO 005 20190305011820 008 171204t20182018enka b 001 0 eng d 020 $a 0198807953 020 $a 9780198807957 035 $a (OCoLC)1013824793 040 $a YDX $b eng $e rda $c YDX $d ERASA $d BDX $d CDX $d OCLCF $d GSU $d GUA $d WLU $d CRU $d YDX $d CNO $d IDU $d UKMGB $d GYG $d VDB $d SILO 050 4 $a BC177 F36 2018 100 1 $a Fantl, Jeremy, $e author. 245 14 $a The limitations of the open mind / $c Jeremy Fantl. 264 1 $a Oxford, UK : $b Oxford University Press, $c [2018] 300 $a xviii, 229 pages : $b illustrations ; $c 24 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 203-221) and index. 505 0 $a Part I. The epistemology of open-mindedness -- Open-mindedness -- A defense of (a different kind of) dogmatism -- The epistemic efficacy of amateurism -- Psychic phenomena and the existence of God -- Part II. The ethics of participation in argumentation -- The obligation to engage -- Against open-minded engagement (for some people) -- Against closed-minded engagement (in some situations) -- On inviting problematic speakers to campus. 520 8 $a When should we engage with those we disagree with? Jeremy Fantl argues that sometimes we can know that arguments for controversial ideas go wrong even without engaging critically with them or figuring out where they err. Sometimes we shouldn't engage critically with an argument and, if we do engage, we shouldn't engage open-mindedly. 650 0 $a Reasoning. 650 0 $a Discussion $x Philosophy. 650 0 $a Debates and debating $x Philosophy. 880 4 $6 264-00 $c 2�018 941 $a 2 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20191211025920.0 952 $l USUX851 $d 20190402021053.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=FC07DDDC3F1711E98434DF6697128E48 994 $a C0 $b IWAInitiate Another SILO Locator Search