729 records matched your query
04914aam a2200313Ii 4500 001 C983887400A911E7BE28DDD2DAD10320 003 SILO 005 20170304010220 008 151231t20162016dcua b 000 0 eng d 020 $a 0309379857 020 $a 9780309379854 035 $a (OCoLC)933585248 040 $a YDXCP $b eng $e rda $c YDXCP $d OCLCQ $d GWL $d SOI $d OCLCF $d IWA $d SILO 043 $a n-us--- 050 4 $a QH77 U6 R48x 2016 245 02 $a A review of the landscape conservation cooperatives / $c Committee on the Evaluation of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division on Earth and Life Studies, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine. 264 1 $a Washington, DC : $b National Academies Press, $c [2016] 300 $a xvi, 134 pages : $b color illustrations ; $c 28 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 73-77). 505 0 $a Scientific and conservation merits of landscape-scale conservation and the landscape conservation cooperatives -- Evaluating the landscape conservation cooperatives network strategic plan -- An examination of the evaluation process for the landscape conservation cooperatives -- The landscape conservation cooperatives and other similar federal programs -- An assessment of the early accomplishments and likely long-term outcomes and impacts of the landscape conservation cooperatives network -- References -- Appendix A. Greater sage-grouse: a collaborative conservation effort -- Appendix B. Mississippi River basin and Gulf hypoxia: collaborations across multiple LCCs -- Appendix C. Guidance for landscape conservation planning and designs -- Appendix D. Description of other federal programs -- Appendix E. Secretarial order no. 3289 -- Appendix F. Landscape conservation cooperatives 2014 network strategic plan -- Appendix G. Goals of individual LCCs compared to goals of the LCC network strategic plan -- Appendix H. Committee and staff biographies. 520 1 $a "The United States' tradition of conserving fish, wildlife, habitats, and cultural resources dates to the mid-19th century. States have long sought to manage fish and wildlife species within their borders, whereas many early federal conservation efforts focused on setting aside specific places as parks, sanctuaries, or reserves. With advances in landscape ecology over the past quarter-century, conservation planners, scientists, and practitioners began to stress the importance of conservation efforts at the scale of landscapes and seascapes. These larger areas were thought to harbor relatively large numbers of species that are likely to maintain population viability and sustain ecological processes and natural disturbance regimes (often considered critical factors in conserving biodiversity). By focusing conservation efforts at the level of whole ecosystems and landscape, practitioners can better attempt to conserve the vast majority of species in a particular ecosystem. Successfully addressing the large-scale, interlinked problems associated with landscape degradation will necessitate a planning process that bridges different scientific disciplines and across sectors, as well as an understanding of complexity, uncertainty, and the local context of conservation work. The landscape approach aims to develop shared conservation priorities across jurisdictions and across many resources to create a single, collaborative conservation effort that can meet stakeholder needs. Conservation of habitats, species, ecosystem services, and cultural resources in the face of multiple stressors requires governance structures that can bridge the geographic and jurisdictional boundaries of the complex socio-ecological systems in which landscape-level conservation occurs. The Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCC) Network was established to complement and add value to the many ongoing state, tribal, federal, and nongovernmental efforts to address the challenge of conserving species, habitats, ecosystem services, and cultural resources in the face of large scale and long term threats, including climate change. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives evaluates the purpose, goals, and scientific merits of the LCC program within the context of similar programs, and whether the program has resulted in measurable improvements in the health of fish, wildlife, and their habitats"--Publisher's website. 650 0 $a Ecosystem management $z United States. 650 0 $a Biodiversity conservation $z United States. 650 0 $a Nature conservation $z United States. 650 0 $a Landscape protection $z United States. 710 2 $a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.), $e issuing body. 941 $a 1 952 $l USUX851 $d 20180403015942.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=C983887400A911E7BE28DDD2DAD10320Initiate Another SILO Locator Search