1146 records matched your query
04016aam a2200529 i 4500 001 96554530403511EB87AA299C42ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20201217010015 008 190923s2020 enka b 001 0 eng d 010 $a 2019951162 020 $a 0198852398 020 $a 9780198852391 035 $a (OCoLC)1125996541 040 $a YDX $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d BDX $d ERASA $d UKMGB $d YDXIT $d CHVBK $d OCLCF $d STF $d YDX $d OCLCO $d GUA $d BDF $d SILO 042 $a lccopycat 043 $a e-fr--- 050 00 $a PQ239 $b .K46 2020 082 04 $a 840.9003 $2 23 100 1 $a Kenny, Neil, $e author. 245 10 $a Born to write : $b literary families and social hierarchy in early modern France / $c Neil Kenny. 250 $a First edition. 264 1 $a Oxford ; $b Oxford University Press, $c 2020. 300 $a xii, 407 pages : $b illustrations ; $c 24 cm 520 8 $a Families were driving forces in the production-that is, in the composing, editing, translating, or publishing-of countless works. Relatives collaborated with each other, edited each other, or continued the unfinished works of deceased family members; some imitated or were inspired by the works of long-dead relatives. The reason why this second fact (about families) is connected to the first (about social hierarchy) is that families were in the period a basic social medium through which social0status was claimed, maintained, threatened, or lost. So producing literary works was one of the many ways in which families claimed their place in the social world. The process was however often fraught, difficult, or disappointing. If families created works as a form of socio-cultural legacy that might continue to benefit their future members, not all members benefited equally; women sometimes produced or claimed the legacy for themselves, but they were often sidelined from it. Relatives sometimes disagreed bitterly about family history, identity (not least religious), and so about the picture of themselves and their family that they wished to project more widely in society through their written works, whether printed or manuscript. So although family was a fundamental social medium out of which so many works emerged, that process could be conflictual as well as harmonious. The intertwined role of family and social hierarchy within literary production is explored in this book through the case of France, from the late fifteenth to the mid-seventeenth century. Some families are studied here in detail, such as that of the most widely read French poet of the age, Clement Marot. But the extent of this phenomenon is quantified too: some two hundred families are identified as each containing more than one literary producer, and in the case of one family an extraordinary twenty-seven. 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 648 7 $a 1500-1699 $2 fast 650 0 $a Book industries and trade $z France $x History $y 16th century. 650 0 $a Book industries and trade $z France $x History $y 17th century. 650 0 $a Families in literature. 650 0 $a Authors, French $y 16th century $v Biography. 650 0 $a Authors, French $y 17th century $v Biography. 650 0 $a Families $z France $x History $y 16th century. 650 0 $a Families $z France $x History $y 17th century. 650 7 $a Authors, French. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00822016 650 7 $a Book industries and trade. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00836171 650 7 $a Families. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01728849 650 7 $a Families in literature. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00920365 650 7 $a Social conditions. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01919811 651 0 $a France $x Social conditions $y 16th century. 651 0 $a France $x Social conditions $y 17th century. 651 7 $a France. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01204289 655 7 $a Biographies. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01919896 655 7 $a History. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01411628 655 7 $a Literary criticism. $2 lcgft 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20220317032305.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=96554530403511EB87AA299C42ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search