770 records matched your query
03653aam a2200433 i 4500 001 344A68680B6411EAA467CE0D97128E48 003 SILO 005 20191120010135 008 180918t20192019enk b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2018044755 020 $a 1849463824 020 $a 9781849463829 035 $a (OCoLC)1054262086 040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d OCLCF $d UKMGB $d GUL $d YDX $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a KF9662 $b .G53 2019 100 1 $a Giannoulopoulos, Dimitrios, $e author. 245 10 $a Improperly obtained evidence in Anglo-American and continental law / $c Dimitrios Giannoulopoulos. 264 1 $a Oxford, UK : $b Hart Publishing, $c 2019. 300 $a xxxv, 292 pages ; $c 24 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 520 $a "This is the first book to offer an extensive cosmopolitan, cross-cultural, insight into the perennial controversy over the use of improperly obtained evidence in criminal trials. It challenges the conventional view that exclusionary rules are idiosyncratic of Anglo-American law, and highlights the "constitutionalisation" and "internationalisation" of criminal evidence and procedure as a cause of rapprochement (or divergence) beyond the Anglo-American and Continental law divide. Analysis focuses on confessional evidence and evidence obtained by search and seizure, telephone interceptions and other means of electronic surveillance. The law of England and Wales, France, Greece and the United States are systematically compared and contrasted throughout this study, but, where appropriate, analysis extends to other Anglo-American and Continental legal systems, including Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Portugal and international criminal courts. The book reviews exclusionary rules vis-a-vis the operation of judicial discretion, and explores the normative justifications that underpin them. It attempts to reinvigorate the idea of excluding evidence to protect constitutional or human rights (the rights thesis), arguing that there is significant scope for Anglo-American and Continental legal systems to place a renewed emphasis on it, particularly in relation to confessional evidence obtained in violation of custodial interrogation rights; we can locate an emerging rapprochement, and unique potential for ECHR jurisprudence to build consensus, in this respect. In marked contrast, remaining divergence with regards to evidence obtained by privacy violations means there is little momentum to adopt a reinvigorated rights thesis more widely"-- $c Provided by publisher. 650 0 $a Admissible evidence $z United States. 650 0 $a Evidence, Criminal $z United States. 650 0 $a Exclusionary rule (Evidence) $z United States. 650 0 $a Evidence, Criminal. 650 0 $a Conflict of laws $x Evidence. 650 0 $a International criminal courts. 650 7 $a Admissible evidence. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00796951 650 7 $a Conflict of laws $x Evidence. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00874896 650 7 $a Evidence, Criminal. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00917210 650 7 $a Exclusionary rule (Evidence) $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00917728 650 7 $a International criminal courts. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00976876 651 7 $a United States. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 776 08 $i Online version: $a Giannoulopoulos, Dimitrios, author. $t Improperly obtained evidence in Anglo-American and continental law $d Oxford [UK] ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2019 $z 9781509923250 $w (DLC) 2018045927 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20200318013432.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=344A68680B6411EAA467CE0D97128E48Initiate Another SILO Locator Search