633 records matched your query
03581aam a2200505 i 4500 001 EA6BFECC9F4211EBBB7E29A634ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20210417010108 008 200224t20202020enkab b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2020009495 020 $a 110881297X 020 $a 9781108812979 020 $a 1108835635 020 $a 9781108835633 035 $a (OCoLC)1143830608 040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d YDX $d OCLCF $d ERASA $d UKMGB $d GSU $d YDX $d GWL $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a KF8736 $b .F59 2020 100 1 $a Fix, Michael P, $d 1980- $e author. 245 10 $a US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts / $c Michael P. Fix (Georgia State University), Benjamin J. Kassow (University of North Dakota). 246 3 $a U.S. Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts 246 3 $a United States Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts 264 1 $a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2020. 300 $a xxv, 182 pages : $b illustrations (black and white), maps (black and white) ; $c 24 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 169-177) and index. 505 00 $g Concluding thoughts and future extensions. $t State high court usage of District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago : moderate degrees of flexibility -- $t A theory of state high court usage of US Supreme Court precedent -- $t Conceptualizing and measuring how state high courts use US Supreme Court opinions -- $t State high court responses to Atkins v. Virginia : characterized by flexibility -- $t State high court usage of Lemon v. Kurtzman : examining a case of maximum discretion -- $t State high court usage of District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago : moderate degrees of flexibility -- $g Concluding thoughts and future extensions. 520 $a "The role of precedent in the law is complicated. One the one hand, it forms the basis of common law. Adherence to precedent, a doctrine known as stare decisis, forms the foundation that allows for the fundamental principles of stability and uniformity in the law to be built. As the Supreme Court itself has stated, Stare decisis is the preferred course because it promotes the evenhanded, predictable, and consistent development of legal principles, fosters reliance on judicial decisions, and contributes to the actual and perceived integrity of the judicial process"-- $c Provided by the publisher. 610 10 $a United States. $b Supreme Court $x Influence. 610 17 $a United States. $b Supreme Court. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 650 0 $a Courts of last resort $z United States $x States. 650 0 $a Judicial process $z United States $x States. 650 0 $a Stare decisis $z United States. 650 0 $a Federal government $z United States. 650 7 $a Courts of last resort $x U.S. states. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00881853 650 7 $a Federal government. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00922333 650 7 $a Influence (Literary, artistic, etc.) $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00972484 650 7 $a Judicial process $x U.S. states. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00984719 650 7 $a Stare decisis. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01131613 651 7 $a United States. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 700 1 $a Kassow, Benjamin, $e author. 776 08 $i Online version: $a Fix, Michael P, 1980- $t U.S. Supreme Court doctrine in the state high court. $d New York : Cambridge University Press, 2020. $z 9781108891141 $w (DLC) 2020009496 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20231018013058.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=EA6BFECC9F4211EBBB7E29A634ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search