713 records matched your query
03855aam a2200409 i 4500 001 686C4DFEDCB911EC8436229451ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20220526010039 008 200609s2021 enk b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2020026290 020 $a 1108489664 020 $a 9781108489669 035 $a (OCoLC)1158504925 040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d OCLCF $d YDX $d OCLCO $d UtOrBLW $d SILO 042 $a pcc 050 00 $a K3585 $b .S866 2021 $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/classification/K 100 1 $a Sulyok, Katalin, $d 1986- $e author. $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2021085890 245 10 $a Science and judicial reasoning : $b the legitimacy of international environmental adjudication / $c Katalin Sulyok. 264 1 $a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2021. 300 $a xxxii, 398 pages ; $c 24 cm. 490 1 $a Cambridge studies on environment, energy and natural resources governance 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 505 0 $a Introduction to a comparative study on judicial engagement with science -- The rules of judicial engagement with science : a three-fold challenge -- Judicial engagement with science in the environmental case : law of the International Court of Justice -- Science in the practice of inter-state arbitral tribunals -- Science in the environmental jurisprudence of regional human rights courts -- Scientific claims before the WTO -- Science in the practice of investment arbitral tribunals -- Science appears before the international tribunal for the Law of the Sea -- Trends in judicial engagement with science : a comparative assessment -- Science and the legitimacy of judicial reasoning. 520 $a "Science often entails connotations of 'objectivity', 'certainty', and the capability to discover the 'factual truth'. Judicial decisions, in turn, are routinely associated with resolving disputes in a 'final', 'neutral', and 'authoritative' way. Yet international environmental adjudication, where scientific and legal authority get entangled with each other, suggests that neither science nor law can fully live up to these idealized expectations. What happens if science and law yield competing narratives as to the factual basis of a dispute? Who could and should resolve their conflict and how, based on what benchmarks? Would the uncertain, probabilistic nature of scientific input diminish the authority of a legal judgment based upon it?"-- $c Provided by publisher. 650 0 $a Environmental law, International. $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85044188 650 0 $a Judicial process. $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85070959 650 0 $a Science and law. $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85118618 650 0 $a Arbitration (International law) $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85006453 650 7 $a Arbitration (International law) $2 fast $0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1761738 $0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1761738 650 7 $a Environmental law, International. $2 fast $0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/913170 $0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/913170 650 7 $a Judicial process. $2 fast $0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/984705 $0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/984705 650 7 $a Science and law. $2 fast $0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1108529 $0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1108529 776 08 $i Online version: $a Sulyok, Katalin. $t Science and judicial reasoning $d Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2021 $z 9781108779173 $w (DLC) 2020026291 830 0 $a Cambridge studies on environment, energy and natural resource governance. $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2018105314 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20231018021429.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=686C4DFEDCB911EC8436229451ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search