The Locator -- [(subject = "Informed Consent")]

266 records matched your query       


Record 23 | Previous Record | Long Display | Next Record
03324aam a2200481 i 4500
001 47F4592CFAD211E7A45C351A97128E48
003 SILO
005 20180116092551
008 170724s2017    enk      b    001 0 eng d
010    $a 2017385980
020    $a 1107164001 (hbk.)
020    $a 9781107164000 (hbk.)
035    $a (OCoLC)990184927
040    $a NLE $b eng $e rda $c NLE $d DLC $d YDX $d OCLCF $d SLU $d RCJ $d CHVBK $d SILO
042    $a lccopycat
043    $a e-uk-en $a e-uk-en
050 00 $a KJC1020 $b .K66 2017
060  4 $a WM 33 FA1 $b K82m 2017
082 04 $a 344.044 $2 23
100 1  $a Kong, Camillia, $e author.
245 10 $a Mental capacity in relationship : $b decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy / $c Camillia Kong, University of Kent.
264  1 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2017.
300    $a xiii, 258 pages ; $c 23 cm.
490 1  $a Cambridge bioethics and law
504    $a Includes bibliographical references (page 241-250) and index.
520 8  $a Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity, but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialogue can enable or disable the decision-making abilities of these individuals. This is thoroughly investigated using an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophy and legal analysis of the law in England and Wales, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. By exploring key concepts underlying mental capacity, the investigation concludes that both primary relationships, as well as capacity assessments themselves, must display key competencies in order to ensure that autonomy skills are promoted and encouraged. This ultimately provides scope for justifiable interventions into disabling relationships and articulates the dialogical practices that help better situate, interpret, and understand the choices and actions of individuals with impairments.
505 00 $t Rethinking capacity. $t Mental capacity, legal capacity, and relational rights -- $t Relational autonomy and the promotion of decisional capacity -- $t Procedural reasoning and the social space of reasons in capacity assessments -- $t Ethical duties of support and intervention -- $t Hermeneutic competence and the dialogical conditions of capacity -- $t Rethinking capacity.
650  0 $a Capacity and disability $z Europe.
650  0 $a Capacity and disability $z England.
650  0 $a Mental health laws $z Europe.
650  0 $a Mental health laws $z England.
650  7 $a Capacity and disability. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00846210
650  7 $a Decision making. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00889035
650  7 $a Interpersonal relations. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00977397
650  7 $a Mental health laws. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01016447
650  2 $a Mental Competency $x legislation & jurisprudence.
650  2 $a Informed Consent $x legislation & jurisprudence.
651  2 $a United Kingdom.
776 08 $i ebook version : $z 9781316730492
830  0 $a Cambridge bioethics and law.
941    $a 1
952    $l OVUX522 $d 20191210023203.0
956    $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=47F4592CFAD211E7A45C351A97128E48

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.