Introduction: Myths, men, and policy making -- The combat exclusion is a story we tell ourselves...about men -- The disintegration of the combat exclusion in Iraq and Afghanistan -- It just doesn't feel right: emotion adn the combat exclusion policy -- Faster, stronger, more male: women and the failure of physical standards -- Sex, cohesion, and national security -- Using online debates to map public reaction to the combat exclusion.
Summary:
Women can't fight. This assumption lies at the heart of the combat exclusion, a policy that was fiercely defended as essential to national security, despite evidence that women have been contributing to hostile operations now and throughout history. This book examines the role of women in the US military and the key arguments used to justify the combat exclusion, in the light of the decision to reverse the policy in 2013. The author considers the historic role of the combat exclusion in shaping American military identity and debunks claims that the recent policy change signals a new era for women in the military. Placing the policy in the broader context, the author shows how women's exclusion from combat reaffirms male supremacy in the military and sustains a key military myth, that of the band of brothers. She traces the myth from Freud to HBO in her critical analysis and history of the role of women in combat.
This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.