The Locator -- [(title = "combinations")]

764 records matched your query       


Record 4 | Previous Record | Long Display | Next Record
06319aam a2200469 i 4500
001 509733882E0111EFA856D47D28ECA4DB
003 SILO
005 20240619010048
008 220308t20232023enk      b    001 0 eng  
010    $a 2022010252
020    $a 100901529X
020    $a 9781009015295
020    $a 1316516768
020    $a 9781316516768
035    $a (OCoLC)1313481886
040    $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d OCLCF $d YDX $d TLK $d UKMGB $d CLU $d QGK $d YDX $d PLL $d WLL $d SILO
042    $a pcc
043    $a n-us---
050 00 $a KF1414 $b .F46 2023
130 0  $a Feminist judgments (Corporate law rewritten)
245 10 $a Feminist judgments : $b corporate law rewritten / $c edited by Anne M. Choike, Michigan State University College of Law, Usha R. Rodrigues, University of Georgia School of Law, Kelli Alces Williams, Florida State University.
246 3  $a Corporate law rewritten
264  1 $a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2023.
300    $a xxx, 458 pages ; $c 24 cm.
490 1  $a Feminist judgments series
504    $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $g 17. $t The importance of incorporating feminist perspectives in corporate law : analyzing the foundations and future directions of feminist and feminist-inspired corporate law scholarship / $g 1. $t Introduction to the feminist judgments : corporate law rewritten project / $r Anne M. Choike, Martha Albertson Fineman, and Cheryl Wade. $g Part II. $t Legal personality, identity, and limited liability of corporate entities. $g 2. $t Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) / $r Commentary: Amy Sepinwall, Judgment: Carliss Chatman -- $g 3. $t Walkovzsky v. Carlton, 223 N.E.2d 6 (N.Y. 1966) / $r Commentary: Janis Sarra and Cheryl Wade, Judgment: Poonam Puri and Ankita Gupta -- $g Part III. $t Role and purpose of the corporation and corporate combinations in society. $g 4. $t Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919) / $r Commentary: Jena Martin, Judgment: Barnali Choudhury -- $g 5. $t Merriam v. Demoulas Super Mkts., 985 N.E.2d 388 (Mass. 2013) / $r Commentary: Sunitha Malepati, Judgment: Alicia E. Plerhoples -- $g 6. $t Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986) / $r Commentary: Afra Afsharipour, Judgment: Christina Sautter -- $g 7. $t Agreement between Harvey Weinstein and The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC, as of October 20, 2015 / $r Commentary: Alexandra Andhov, Contract: Susan Chesler -- $g Part IV. $t Fiduciary duties in corporate governance. $g 8. $t Meinhard v. Salmon, 164 N.E. 545 (N.Y. 1928) / $r Commentary: Christina Hurt, Judgment: Dalia Tsuk Mitchell -- $g 9. $t Smith v. Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985) / $r Commentary: Virginia Harper Ho, Judgment: Lua Kamal Yuille -- $g 10. $t White v. Panic, 783 A.2d 543 (Del. 2001) / $r Commentary: Kellye Testy, Judgment: Sarah Haan -- $g 11. $t Francis v. United Jersey Bank, 432 A.2d 814 (N.J. 1981) / $r Commentary: Faith Stevelman, Judgment: Jonathan W. Smith -- $g 12. $t In re The Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation, 906 A.2d 27 (Del. 2006) / $r Commentary: Laura Rosenbury, Judgment: Hillary Sale -- $g Part V. $t Closely held businesses and other considerations regarding the composition of boards, management, and owners. $g 13. $t Ringling Bros-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Ringling, 53 A.2d 441 (Del. 1947) / $r Commentary: Gabriel Rauterberg, Judgment: Benjamin Means -- $g 14. $t Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype, 328 N.E.2d 505 (Mass. 1975) / $r Commentary: Jessica Kiser, Judgment: Cindy Schipani -- $g Part VI. $t Protecting investors and potential investors in corporations. $g 15. $t SEC v. W. J. Howey Co. et al., 328 U.S. 293 (1946) / $r Commentary: Kristin Johnson and Carla Reyes, Judgment: Theresa Gabaldon -- $g 16. $t U.S. v. Chestman, 947 F.2d 551 (2d Cir., 1991) / $r Commentary: Donna M. Nagy, Judgment: Karen Woody -- $g Part VII. $t From foundations to future directions. $g 17. $t The importance of incorporating feminist perspectives in corporate law : analyzing the foundations and future directions of feminist and feminist-inspired corporate law scholarship / $r Anne M. Choike, Martha Albertson Fineman, and Cheryl Wade.
520    $a "The modern American public corporation stands at the center of various forms of inequality in our society-because of its influence on the economy, the environment, and the government as well as its own employees and consumers. But corporate law has long overlooked the feminist perspective, to the detriment of many underrepresented minority populations. In this edited volume, a diverse group of scholars takes up the challenge to rewrite corporate law from a feminist perspective. Applying a feminist perspective to corporate governance and corporate law allows us to see what the world would look like if corporations were governed by different individuals with different priorities. The feminist judgments in this volume take on (1) the foundational principle that corporations are entities that possess a legal identity separate and distinct from their owners and the related concept of limited liability; (2) the appropriate scope of the rights that accompany corporate ownership (such as the "shareholder wealth maximization" norm); (3) the lack of diversity on corporate boards and at top management levels as well as the meaning of fiduciary duties; (4) the effects of interpersonal relationships in close corporations; and (5) the availability of protection for vulnerable investors and potential investors"-- $c Provided by publisher.
650  0 $a Corporation law $z United States $v Cases.
650  0 $a Feminist jurisprudence $z United States.
650  6 $a Feminisme et droit $z Etats-Unis.
650  7 $a Feminist jurisprudence. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00922778
651  7 $a United States. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01204155
655  7 $a Trials, litigation, etc. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01423712
700 1  $a Choike, Anne, $d 1984- $e editor.
700 1  $a Rodrigues, Usha R., $d 1973- $e editor.
700 1  $a Williams, Kelli Alces, $d 1980- $e editor.
776 08 $i Online version: $t Feminist judgments: corporate law rewritten $d New York : Cambridge University Press, [2022] $z 9781009025010 $w (DLC)  2022010253
830  0 $a Feminist judgments series
941    $a 1
952    $l OVUX522 $d 20240619011319.0
956    $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=509733882E0111EFA856D47D28ECA4DB

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.