The Locator -- [(subject = "Féminisme")]

291 records matched your query       


Record 17 | Previous Record | MARC Display | Next Record | Search Results
Author:
Feminist judgments (Corporate law rewritten)
Title:
Feminist judgments : corporate law rewritten / edited by Anne M. Choike, Michigan State University College of Law, Usha R. Rodrigues, University of Georgia School of Law, Kelli Alces Williams, Florida State University.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press,
Copyright Date:
2023
Description:
xxx, 458 pages ; 24 cm.
Subject:
Corporation law--United States--Cases.
Feminist jurisprudence--United States.
Feminisme et droit--Etats-Unis.
Feminist jurisprudence.
United States.
Trials, litigation, etc.
Other Authors:
Choike, Anne, 1984- editor.
Rodrigues, Usha R., 1973- editor.
Williams, Kelli Alces, 1980- editor.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents:
17. The importance of incorporating feminist perspectives in corporate law : analyzing the foundations and future directions of feminist and feminist-inspired corporate law scholarship / 1. Introduction to the feminist judgments : corporate law rewritten project / Anne M. Choike, Martha Albertson Fineman, and Cheryl Wade. Part II. Legal personality, identity, and limited liability of corporate entities. 2. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) / Commentary: Amy Sepinwall, Judgment: Carliss Chatman -- 3. Walkovzsky v. Carlton, 223 N.E.2d 6 (N.Y. 1966) / Commentary: Janis Sarra and Cheryl Wade, Judgment: Poonam Puri and Ankita Gupta -- Part III. Role and purpose of the corporation and corporate combinations in society. 4. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919) / Commentary: Jena Martin, Judgment: Barnali Choudhury -- 5. Merriam v. Demoulas Super Mkts., 985 N.E.2d 388 (Mass. 2013) / Commentary: Sunitha Malepati, Judgment: Alicia E. Plerhoples -- 6. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986) / Commentary: Afra Afsharipour, Judgment: Christina Sautter -- 7. Agreement between Harvey Weinstein and The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC, as of October 20, 2015 / Commentary: Alexandra Andhov, Contract: Susan Chesler -- Part IV. Fiduciary duties in corporate governance. 8. Meinhard v. Salmon, 164 N.E. 545 (N.Y. 1928) / Commentary: Christina Hurt, Judgment: Dalia Tsuk Mitchell -- 9. Smith v. Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985) / Commentary: Virginia Harper Ho, Judgment: Lua Kamal Yuille -- 10. White v. Panic, 783 A.2d 543 (Del. 2001) / Commentary: Kellye Testy, Judgment: Sarah Haan -- 11. Francis v. United Jersey Bank, 432 A.2d 814 (N.J. 1981) / Commentary: Faith Stevelman, Judgment: Jonathan W. Smith -- 12. In re The Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation, 906 A.2d 27 (Del. 2006) / Commentary: Laura Rosenbury, Judgment: Hillary Sale -- Part V. Closely held businesses and other considerations regarding the composition of boards, management, and owners. 13. Ringling Bros-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Ringling, 53 A.2d 441 (Del. 1947) / Commentary: Gabriel Rauterberg, Judgment: Benjamin Means -- 14. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype, 328 N.E.2d 505 (Mass. 1975) / Commentary: Jessica Kiser, Judgment: Cindy Schipani -- Part VI. Protecting investors and potential investors in corporations. 15. SEC v. W. J. Howey Co. et al., 328 U.S. 293 (1946) / Commentary: Kristin Johnson and Carla Reyes, Judgment: Theresa Gabaldon -- 16. U.S. v. Chestman, 947 F.2d 551 (2d Cir., 1991) / Commentary: Donna M. Nagy, Judgment: Karen Woody -- Part VII. From foundations to future directions. 17. The importance of incorporating feminist perspectives in corporate law : analyzing the foundations and future directions of feminist and feminist-inspired corporate law scholarship / Anne M. Choike, Martha Albertson Fineman, and Cheryl Wade.
Summary:
"The modern American public corporation stands at the center of various forms of inequality in our society-because of its influence on the economy, the environment, and the government as well as its own employees and consumers. But corporate law has long overlooked the feminist perspective, to the detriment of many underrepresented minority populations. In this edited volume, a diverse group of scholars takes up the challenge to rewrite corporate law from a feminist perspective. Applying a feminist perspective to corporate governance and corporate law allows us to see what the world would look like if corporations were governed by different individuals with different priorities. The feminist judgments in this volume take on (1) the foundational principle that corporations are entities that possess a legal identity separate and distinct from their owners and the related concept of limited liability; (2) the appropriate scope of the rights that accompany corporate ownership (such as the "shareholder wealth maximization" norm); (3) the lack of diversity on corporate boards and at top management levels as well as the meaning of fiduciary duties; (4) the effects of interpersonal relationships in close corporations; and (5) the availability of protection for vulnerable investors and potential investors"-- Provided by publisher.
Series:
Feminist judgments series
ISBN:
100901529X
9781009015295
1316516768
9781316516768
OCLC:
(OCoLC)1313481886
LCCN:
2022010252
Locations:
OVUX522 -- University of Iowa Libraries (Iowa City)

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.