209 records matched your query
03713aam a2200505 i 4500 001 D46C1C72141211EF8F56A7732FECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20240517010047 008 230113t20222022ne abce b 001 0 eng d 010 $a 2023454544 020 $a 9462585172 020 $a 9789462585171 020 $a 9462585342 020 $a 9789462585348 035 $a (OCoLC)1371109630 040 $a ZCU $b eng $e rda $c ZCU $d JPG $d ERASA $d OCLCO $d UKMGB $d YDX $d BDX $d DRB $d OCLCF $d CLART $d TXKAM $d DLC $d OCLCL $d OHX $d CLE $d SILO 041 1 $a eng $h dut 050 04 $a ND653.R4 $b S3913 2022 082 04 $a 700-9492 100 1 $a Schwartz, Gary, $d 1940- $e author. $1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJrcqJHT3PDVmrDQVVmPQq 240 10 $a Rembrandt met rode baret. $l English 245 10 $a Rembrandt in a red beret : $b the vanishings and reappearances of a self-portrait / $c Gary Schwartz ; translation, Loekie Schwartz, Laura Woolthuis. 246 30 $a Vanishings and reappearances of a self-portrait 264 1 $a Zwolle : $b WBOOKS, $c [2022] 300 $a 336 pages : $b illustrations (chiefly color), maps, portraits, plan, facsimiles ; $c 26 cm 520 8 $a "[This book] follows the fortunes of a fascinating painting along two lines. First is the history of the painting as a precious collector’s object, a story almost too unlikely to be true. In 1823 it was bought by the future King Willem II as one of his first purchases for the greatest collection of paintings ever assembled by a Dutch individual. For nearly a hundred years it remained with his heirs, coming to Weimar. Then, in 1921 it was stolen from the Weimar Museum, to turn up in 1945 in Dayton, Ohio, owned by a man who said he bought it in 1934 from a German sailor on the New York waterfront. What followed is revealed in this book for the first time, based on declassified U.S. government information. In 1947 the U.S. government seized the Rembrandt under such strict terms that 20 years later, when it wanted to return it to Germany, it was forced to go into legislative and diplomatic gymnastics to do so. Upon its return, an heir to the Weimar title sued for its restitution, and after seven years of one trial after another, she got it. She sold it in 1983 to the private collector who still owns it. Since 1921 it has been on public display only for 10 days in Dayton (1947) and 10 weeks in Washington (1967). The book also traces the critical history of the painting as a Rembrandt. In 1969 his authorship was disputed by Horst Gerson, an opinion that was seconded by the Rembrandt Research Project. Examining all the evidence and arguments, the eminent Rembrandt specialist Gary Schwartz comes to the conclusion that there is no reason not to accept the painting for what it looks like – a self-portrait of the great master, painted by his own hand"--Amazon. 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 299-305) and index. 600 00 $a Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn, $d 1606-1669 $x Self-portraits. 600 07 $a Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn, $d 1606-1669 $2 fast 650 0 $a Art $x Provenance. 650 0 $a Art $x History and criticism. 650 6 $a Art $x Provenance. 650 7 $a provenance (history of ownership) $2 aat 650 7 $a Self-portraits, Dutch $2 fast 650 7 $a Painting, Dutch $2 fast 650 7 $a Art thefts $2 fast 650 7 $a Criticism $2 fast 648 7 $a 1600-1699 $2 fast 655 7 $a History $2 fast 700 0 $a Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn, $d 1606-1669. 700 1 $a Schwartz, Loekie, $e translator. 700 1 $a Woolthuis, Laura, $e translator. 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20240517011104.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=D46C1C72141211EF8F56A7732FECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search