193 records matched your query
03922aam a2200325Ii 4500 001 A430F844129911EBB48536AA50ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20201020010019 008 200221s2020 sz b 000 0 eng d 020 $a 3030431223 020 $a 9783030431228 035 $a (OCoLC)1196336809 040 $a GXR $b eng $e rda $c GXR $d OCLCO $d SILO 050 4 $a K5452 $b .R54 2020 245 04 $a The right to counsel and the protection of attorney-client privilege in criminal proceedings : $b a comparative view / $c Lorena Bachmaier Winter, Stephen C. Thaman, Veronica Lynn, editors. 264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer, $c [2020] 300 $a vi, 440 pages ; $c 25 cm. 490 1 $a Global studies in comparative law ; $x 2214-6881 ; $v volume 44. $a Global studies in comparative law ; $v volume 44. 504 $a Includes bibliographical references. 520 $a The book provides an overview of the right to counsel and the attorney-client privilege in the following 12 jurisdictions: China, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, UK and USA. The right to counsel is a fundamental right providing the accused access to justice in criminal proceedings. Lawyers can only practice their profession properly if clients have complete trust in their lawyers discretion. This trust is safeguarded by the attorney-client privilege, which is an indispensable part of every constitutional state and one of the most important professional duties of a lawyer. It is of particular importance in criminal proceedings regarding the protection of the confidentiality of lawyer-client communications in the different procedural stages, coercive measures as well as the various duties and interests in play. However, the communications protected by attorney-client privilege vary greatly from country to country. With regard to criminal investigations in an increasingly globalised world, where sophisticated tools enable broad digital investigations, there is an urgent need to clarify how this fundamental right is protected at both the national and supranational level. Each chapter explores the regulations, practices and recent developments in each jurisdiction and was written by highly qualified experts in the legal field - from academia and practice alike. It identifies possible solutions and best practices, providing valuable insights for practitioners and law-making bodies alike regarding the actual protection (or lack thereof) of lawyer-client confidentiality in the pretrial and trial stage of criminal proceedings. 505 0 $a Right to Counsel and Confidentiality of Correspondence with Counsel as a Requirement of a Fair Trial in Japan -- Confidentiality of Correspondence with Counsel as a Requirement of a Fair Trial in Germany -- Confidentiality of Correspondence with Counsel as a Requirement of a Fair Trial in Italy -- Confidentiality of Correspondence with Counsel as a Requirement of a Fair Trial in Portugal -- Confidentiality of Attorney-Client Communications in Chinas Criminal Justice System -- The Right to Counsel within Criminal Proceedings in Switzerland -- Confidentiality of Correspondence with Counsel as a Requirement of a Fair Trial in Poland -- Confidentiality of Attorney-Client Communications in the United States -- Confidentiality of correspondence with Counsel as a Requirement of a Fair Trial in Spain -- The Lawyer-Client Privilege in the Case-lLw of the ECtHR -- Protecting Confidentiality of Lawyer-Client Communications Worldwide. Comparative Study. 650 0 $a Right to counsel. 650 0 $a Confidential communications $x Lawyers. 700 1 $a Bachmaier, Lorena, $e editor. 700 1 $a Thaman, Stephen, $d 1946- $e editor. 700 1 $a Lynn, Veronica, $e editor. 830 0 $a Ius comparatum ; $v v. 44. 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20210721014100.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=A430F844129911EBB48536AA50ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search