450 records matched your query
04156aam a2200541 i 4500 001 19376F38803411ED944134D030ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20221220010056 008 211209t20222022ilu b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2021059029 020 $a 0226821404 020 $a 9780226821405 020 $a 0226821390 020 $a 9780226821399 035 $a (OCoLC)1294152467 040 $a ICU/DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d BDX $d YDX $d OCLCF $d OCLCO $d UCO $d YDX $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a KF4765 $b .F54 2022 100 1 $a Fleming, James E., $e author. 245 10 $a Constructing basic liberties : $b a defense of substantive due process / $c James E. Fleming. 264 1 $a Chicago, IL : $b The University of Chicago Press, $c 2022. 300 $a 274 pages ; $c 23 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 505 0 $a A second death of substantive due process? Our practice of substantive due process ; The coherence and structure of substantive due process ; The rational continuum of ordered liberty -- Substantive due process does not "effectively decree the end of morals legislation". Is substantive due process on a slippery slope to "the end of all morals legislation"? ; Is moral disapproval enough to justify traditional morals legislation -- Substantive due process does not enact a utopian economic or moral theory. The ghost of Lochner v. New York ; Does substantive due process enact Mill's On Liberty? -- Conflicts between liberty and equality. The grounds for protecting basic liberties: liberty together with equality ; Accommodating gay and lesbian rights and religious liberty -- The future. The future of substantive due process. 520 $a "From reproductive rights to marriage for same-sex couples, many of our basic liberties owe their protection to landmark Supreme Court decisions that have hinged on the doctrine of substantive due process. This doctrine is controversial-a battleground for opposing views around the relationship between law and morality in circumstances of moral pluralism-and is deeply vulnerable today. Against recurring charges that the practice of substantive due process is dangerously indeterminate and irredeemably undemocratic, Constructing Basic Liberties reveals the underlying coherence and structure of substantive due process and defends it as integral to our constitutional democracy. Reviewing the development of the doctrine over the last half-century, James E. Fleming rebuts popular arguments against substantive due process and shows that the Supreme Court has constructed basic liberties through common law constitutional interpretation: reasoning by analogy from one case to the next and making complex normative judgments about what basic liberties are significant for personal self-government. Elaborating key distinctions and tools for interpretation, Fleming makes a powerful case that substantive due process is a worthy practice that is based on the best understanding of our constitutional commitments to protecting ordered liberty and securing the status and benefits of equal citizenship for all"-- $c Provided by publisher. 610 10 $a United States. $b Supreme Court. 610 16 $a Etats-Unis. $b Supreme Court. 610 17 $a United States. $b Supreme Court. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 650 0 $a Due process of law $z United States. 650 0 $a Civil rights $z United States. 650 0 $a Liberty. 650 0 $a Law and ethics. 650 2 $a Freedom 650 6 $a Application reguliere de la loi $z Etats-Unis. 650 6 $a Droits de l'homme $z Etats-Unis. 650 6 $a Liberte. 650 6 $a Droit et morale. 650 7 $a freedom. $2 aat 650 7 $a Civil rights. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00862627 650 7 $a Due process of law. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00899343 650 7 $a Law and ethics. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00993904 650 7 $a Liberty. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00997251 651 7 $a United States. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 941 $a 2 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20231021012225.0 952 $l GBPF771 $d 20230203012231.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=19376F38803411ED944134D030ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search