The Locator -- [(subject = "Combatants and noncombatants International law")]

118 records matched your query       


Record 3 | Previous Record | Long Display | Next Record
03017aam a22003738i 4500
001 A173BF56CF3111EB9A1890BA3BECA4DB
003 SILO
005 20210617010040
008 201103s2021    enk      b    001 0 eng  
010    $a 2020044907
020    $a 0367435802
020    $a 9780367435806
035    $a (OCoLC)1204267862
040    $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d YDX $d OCLCF $d UKMGB $d SILO
042    $a pcc
050 00 $a KZ6396 $b .V36 2021
100 1  $a Van Goozen, Sara, $d 1990- $e author.
245 10 $a Distributing the harm of just wars : $b in defence of an egalitarian baseline / $c Sara van Goozen.
263    $a 2103
264  1 $a Abingdon, Oxon ; $b Routledge, $c 2021.
300    $a 1 volume : $b illustrations (black and white) ; $c 24 cm.
490 0  $a War, conflict and ethics
504    $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
520    $a "This book argues that the risk of harm in armed conflict should be divided equally between combatants and enemy non-combatants. International law requires that combatants in war take 'all feasible precautions' to minimize damage to civilian objects, injury to civilians, and incidental loss of civilian life. However, there is no clear explanation of what 'feasible precautions' means in this context, or what would count as sufficiently minimised incidental harm. As a result, it is difficult to judge whether a particular war or offensive actually satisfies this requirement. Just war theorists often consider it common sense that merely not intending to harm innocent civilians is not sufficient, but there is little clarity in the literature regarding what this means. One crucial question that is almost always overlooked is that of what the appropriate baseline distribution of risk should be. This book defends the Minimal Harm Requirement (MHR), which states that combatants should make an effort to reduce merely foreseen harm to enemy non-combatants to the lowest reasonable level. In order to assess which risk impositions are reasonable, and which are not, an egalitarian baseline should be adopted, suggesting that other things being equal risk of harm should be distributed equally between just combatants and unjust non-combatants. This book will be of much interest to students of just war theory, ethics, security studies and international relations"-- $c Provided by publisher.
650  0 $a Just war doctrine.
650  0 $a Combatants and noncombatants (International law)
650  0 $a Civilians in war.
650  7 $a Civilians in war. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01746486
650  7 $a Combatants and noncombatants (International law) $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00868951
650  7 $a Just war doctrine. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00985112
776 08 $i Online version: $a Van Goozen, Sara, 1990- $t Distributing the harm of just wars $d Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2021 $z 9781003004479 $w (DLC)  2020044908
941    $a 1
952    $l OVUX522 $d 20231019024642.0
956    $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=A173BF56CF3111EB9A1890BA3BECA4DB

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.