67 records matched your query
03351aam a2200481 i 4500 001 970FB45EE9E711E69A6025A3DAD10320 003 SILO 005 20170203020341 008 150826s2016 cau b 001 0 eng c 010 $a 2015033514 020 $a 0804798001 020 $a 9780804798006 020 $a 0804796068 020 $a 9780804796064 035 $a (OCoLC)920551966 040 $a CSt/DLC $b eng $e rda $c STF $d DLC $d OCLCF $d YDXCP $d NLGGC $d BDX $d BTCTA $d GWL $d CDX $d UCILW $d DAC $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a KF4772 B38 2016 100 1 $a Batchis, Wayne, $d 1974- $e author. 245 14 $a The right's First Amendment : $b the politics of free speech & the return of conservative libertarianism / $c Wayne Batchis. 246 30 $a Politics of free speech and the return of conservative libertarianism 264 1 $a Stanford, California : $b Stanford Law Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press, $c [2016] 300 $a xiv, 281 pages ; $c 24 cm 490 1 $a Stanford studies in law and politics 505 0 $a Introduction : the right's First Amendment -- Conservatism, the First Amendment, and National Review -- The political science of judicial decision making -- Political correctness and the rise of the conservative victim -- The courts and the political correctness indictment -- The rise of free-market conservatism -- Commercial speech in the modern era -- Citizens United and the paradox of associational speech. 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 231-269) and index. 520 $a "Not so long ago, being aggressively "pro-free speech" was as closely associated with American political liberalism. But with little notice, this political dynamic has been shaken to the core. The Right's First Amendment examines how conservatives came to adopt, and co-opt, constitutional expressive rights. Free speech on college campuses in the 1960s was seen as a guarantee for social agitators and hippies--but today, for many conservatives, it represents instead a crucial shield protecting unfashionable traditionalists from a perceived scourge of political correctness and liberal oversensitivity. Does this shift represent a genuine and principled change in conservative philosophy, or merely a results-oriented strategy? What do these changes mean for the future of First Amendment interpretation? Wayne Batchis explores these questions by surveying six decades of the conservative publication National Review. Presented alongside evolving constitutional law, Batchis reveals how this keystone of American civics now carries a much more complex and nuanced political identity."--Back cover. 650 0 $a Freedom of speech $z United States. 610 10 $a United States. $t Constitution. $n 1st Amendment. 650 0 $a Political correctness $z United States. 650 0 $a Constitutional law $z United States. 650 0 $a Judicial process $z United States. 650 0 $a Conservatism $z United States. 650 0 $a Libertarianism $z United States. 830 0 $a Stanford studies in law and politics. 941 $a 4 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20191213013343.0 952 $l SOAX911 $d 20170804010524.0 952 $l USUX851 $d 20170503023712.0 952 $l UQAX771 $d 20170302014619.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=970FB45EE9E711E69A6025A3DAD10320 994 $a C0 $b IWAInitiate Another SILO Locator Search