Machine generated contents note: 4. Conclusion. 2. Ideas -- 2.1. Contrasting the ICC and Regional Courts -- 2.2. Method -- 2.3. Sovereign Equality -- 2.4. International Society in African Society -- 2.5. The ICC and Self-Entrapment -- 3. Interests -- 4. Definitions -- 5. Overview -- 6. Postscript -- 1. Africa and International Law After the Cold War -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Proliferation -- 3. Explanations -- 4. The Post-Cold War World -- 4.1. The Rule of Law Revival -- 4.2. The New Regionalism -- 5. Conclusion -- 2. Africa and the International Criminal Court -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Critique -- 2.1. New Alignments -- 2.2. Destabilisation and Interference in Peacemaking -- 2.3. Targeting of Africa -- 2.4. The Role of the Security Council -- 2.5. The Violation of Sovereign Immunity -- 3. Backlash -- 3.7. Regionalising International Justice -- 3.2. Reform -- 4. Conclusion -- 3. Land in Southern Africa -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Extroversion -- 3. The Demise of the SADC Tribunal -- 3.7. Historical Background -- 3.2. Campbell -- 3.3. Backlash -- 3.4. Legitimation -- 3.5. Land -- 4. Aftermath -- 5. Conclusion -- 4. Legality in West Africa -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Extroversion -- 3. Rights, Intervention and Legitimation -- 4. Court Transformation -- 5. Backlash -- 5.7. The Gambia -- 5.2. Non-Compliance -- 5.3. Legality -- 6. Conclusion -- 5. Regional Legacies in East Africa -- 1. Introduction -- 2. East African Integration -- 2.1. The Second EAC -- 2.2. Extroversion -- 3. Backlash -- 3.1. Regime Security -- 3.2. Ugandan and Tanzanian Support -- 3.3. Legitimation -- 4. Conclusion.
Summary:
Why are contemporary African governments working to undermine the international courts they proactively created and supported in the 1990s and early 2000s?
This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.