474 records matched your query
03397aam a2200325 i 4500 001 9B760256FFE911EBB6EAFDEE22ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20210818010020 008 201201s2021 stka b 001 0 eng d 020 $a 1474418066 020 $a 9781474418065 035 $a (OCoLC)1233300488 040 $a UKMGB $b eng $e rda $c UKMGB $d OCLCO $d BDX $d OCLCF $d YDX $d OCLCO $d PTS $d SILO 050 14 $a B2598 $b .C665 2021 100 1 $a Connelly, Stephen James, $e author. 245 10 $a Leibniz : $b a contribution to the archaeology of power / $c Stephen Connelly. 264 1 $a Edinburgh : $b Edinburgh University Press, $c [2021] 300 $a vii, 333 pages : $b illustrations (black and white) ; $c 22 cm. 490 1 $a Encounters in law and philosophy 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 316-328) and index. 505 0 $a From trinity to mind : the intensional basis of the law -- Potency and supposita -- Will : the scholastic heritage -- Will, power and pretensionality -- Ars Combinatoria as Urdoxa -- A new method of teaching law -- Power and obligation in the 1660s -- Power and obligation in the Elementa Iuris Naturalis : the state space. 520 $a "The concept of power has been a major feature of natural law theories. It evolved over the course of several centuries and was arguably the defining notion in both Hobbes’ and Spinoza’s doctrines of natural right. Yet Leibniz appears to effect a reversal in this millennium-long trajectory and demotes power to a derivative term of his philosophy. What was the rationale behind this radical change? And what does this reversal mean for the philosophy that follows? Connelly demonstrates how Leibniz’s rearticulation of power and its associated concepts is motivated at least in part by the struggles that marked the terrain in which his ideas were rooted – the struggle between Reformed and Scholastic theology, between natural law and natural right, and between mechanistic natural philosophy and human freedom. He locates Leibniz within power’s wider evolution, and shows how the universal jurisprudence which Leibniz developed between 1660s and 1690s can be considered as a transformative encounter between power, activity and modality. Drawing on thinkers as diverse as Aristotle, Aquinas, Duns Scotus, Grotius, Husserl and Deleuze, Connelly traces Leibniz’s conceptualisation of power through its applications in his legal texts, revealing that Leibniz in fact reconceptualises power under a new name: the state space. The move amounts to an internalisation of power as a moral world within each individual, submitting each practical agent to a universal set of obligations and prohibitions defined by that world. What though is at stake in bringing the objective world within each individual and submitting it to a public legal order? And what is the significance of this surgical manoeuvre for any archaeology of power? 600 10 $a Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, $c Freiherr von, $d 1646-1716. 600 17 $a Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, $c Freiherr von, $d 1646-1716. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00039580 650 0 $a Power (Philosophy) 650 7 $a Power (Philosophy) $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01074215 830 0 $a Encounters in law and philosophy. 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20231020021104.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=9B760256FFE911EBB6EAFDEE22ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search