27 records matched your query       

05876cam a2200577Ia 4500
001 8F83384456D911DFB46C8AF9A7D7520A
003 SILO
005 20100503122515
008 100326s2010    nyuacd   b    101 0 eng  
020    $a 1402413548
020    $a 9781402413544
035    $a (OCoLC)576092730
040    $a CGQ $c CGQ $d SILO $d LUI $d SILO
111 2  $a Patent Law Institute $n (4th : $d 2010)
245 1  $a 4th annual Patent Law Institute / $c co-chairs, Scott M. Alter, Douglas R. Nemec, John M. White.
246 3  $a Fourth annual Patent Law Institute
246 10 $a Annual Patent Law Institute
246 3  $a Patent Law Institute
260    $a New York, NY : $b Practising Law Institute, $c c2010.
300    $a 991 p. : $b ill., ports., charts ; $c 23 cm.
500    $a "Ord #24078."--Spine
500    $a Prepared for distribution at the program of the same name held March 2010.
504    $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 20 $t Patent Local Rules A Summary and Comparison $r David W. Whealan, Google Inc. -- $t 2009 Federal Circuit Review / $r Denise De Mory, Howrey LLP -- $t Bilski, et. al. v. Kappos, Writ of Certiorari, Brief of Accenture and Pitney Bowes Inc. As Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners, Supreme Court of the United States, No. 08 964 / $r Meredith Martin Addy, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione -- $t The Bilski Effect: Recent and Potential Sea Changes for Statutory Subject Matter / $r Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School; Durie Tangri LLP -- $t PTO Doings I: USPTO Rules and Regulations That Are/Are Not Changing for 2010 / $r Robert J. Spar, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office of Patent Legal Administration -- $t Patent Reexamination: Trends for the 2010s / $r David L. McCombs, Haynes and Boone, LLP -- $t PTO Doings II: USPTO Rules and Regulations That Are/Are Not Changing for 2010 / $r Robert J. Spar, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office of Patent Legal Administration -- $t Mediation in Patent Cases One Judge's Perspective / $r Hon. Mary Pat Thynge, United States District Court, District of Delaware -- $t ADR Skills: Designing a Fair, Efficient, and Cost Effective Arbitration / $r Zela "Zee" G. Claiborne, JAMS -- $t The State of Patent Exhaustion After Quanta / $r Peter J. Kinsella, Faegre & Benson LLP / $r Douglas B. Luftman, Palm, Inc. -- $t Patent Reform: The Debate Continues Into 2010 / $r Philippe J.C. Signore, Ph.D., Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C. -- $t Recent Developments in Patent Law Worldwide / $r Kimberly N. Van Voorhis, Morrison & Foerster LLP -- $t Section 112 in Flux Additional Critical Strategic Issues for Preparing and Prosecuting Patents / $r Dale S. Lazar, DLA Piper LLP (US) -- $t Section 112 in Flux: Critical Strategic Issues for Preparing and Litigating Patents / $r Richard L. Rainey, Covington &  Burling LLP -- $t All Things Chemical and Biotechnical at the PTO / $r Gerald M. Murphy, Jr., Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP / $r Leonard Richard Svensson, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP -- $t Prerequisites to Federal Circuit Review of Judgments / $r Asim Bhansali, Keker & Van Nest, LLP -- $t Willful Infringement and Waiver of Privilege After Seagate / $r William L. LaFuze, Vinson & Elkins LLP -- $t Selecting Forum and Venue for Your Patent Litigation / $r Dorothy R. Auth, Ph.D., Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP / $r Trevor Carter, Baker & Daniels LLP -- $t Survey of Recent Cases Affecting Patent Licensing / $r Richard Ludwin, IBM -- $t Prosecution Ethics / $r Robert C. Faber, Ostrolenk Faber LLP -- $t Ethical Obligations of Patent Practitioners: Do You Know the Rules? / $r Jeffrey G. Sheldon, Sheldon Mak Rose & Anderson PC -- $t Ethical Issues in Patent Discovery / $r Kenneth W. Brothers, Dickstein Shapiro LLP -- $t Ethical Issues in Discovery / $r Jennifer E. Lacroix, DLA Piper LLP (US) -- $t Inequitable Conduct: A Doctrine in a Constant State of Flux A View of the Landscape in 2009 / $r David I. Gindler, Irell & Manella LLP -- $t Inequitable Conduct: A Flawed Doctrine Worth Saving / $r Lisa A. Dolak, Syracuse University College of Law -- $t Beware the Inequitable Conduct Charge! (Why Practitioners Submit What They Submit) / $r Lisa A. Dolak, Syracuse University College of Law -- $t What's Keeping Corporate Counsel Awake at Night? / $r Carolyn H. Blankenship, Thomson Reuters -- $t Patent Issues on the Minds of In House Counsel / $r Valerie Calloway, Polymer Group, Inc. -- $t Patent Issues on the Minds of Corporate Counsel / $r Valerie Calloway, Polymer Group, Inc. -- $t What Keeps In House Counsel Up at Night? / $r Scott M. Alter, Faegre & Benson LLP / $r Roger Kennedy, Trimble Navigation Limited / $r Douglas A. Kundrat, Agilent Technologies, Inc. / $r Steven A. McAuley, Boston Scientific Corporation / $r David M. Simon, Intel Corporation / $r David W. Whealan, Google Inc. -- $t Patent Local Rules A Summary and Comparison
650  0 $a Patent laws and legislation.
650  0 $a Patent suits.
610 10 $a United States. $b Patent and Trademark Office $x Rules and practice.
650  0 $a License agreements.
650  0 $a Patent licenses.
650  0 $a Patents.
650  0 $a Patent infringement.
650  0 $a Patent practice.
650  0 $a Actions and defenses.
650  0 $a Forum selection clause.
650  0 $a Chemical industry $v Patents.
650  0 $a Biotechnology industries $v Patents.
650  0 $a Discovery (Law)
650  0 $a Legal ethics.
650  0 $a Patents (International law)
650  0 $a Appellate procedure.
650  0 $a Dispute resolution (Law)
650  0 $a Corporate legal departments.
700 1  $a Alter, Scott M.
700 1  $a Nemec, Douglas R.
700 1  $a White, John M., $d 1961-
710 2  $a Practising Law Institute.
830  0 $a Intellectual property course handbook series ; $v no. G-997.
941    $a 1
952    $l N5UX522 $d 20100503144750.0
956    $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=8F83384456D911DFB46C8AF9A7D7520A
994    $a 02 $b LUI