178 records matched your query
03095cam a22003618a 4500 001 5DBBF21C62A311DFAF3CE96BC41A358D 003 SILO 005 20100521050008 008 100201s2010 nyu b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2010000087 020 $a 0737747404 (hardcover) 020 $a 9780737747409 (hardcover) 035 $a (OCoLC)441154001 040 $a DLC $c DLC $d SILO $d YDXCP $d IOE $d SILO 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a KF4758 $b .S487 2010 082 00 $a 342.7308/7 $2 22 245 0 $a Sex discrimination / $c Noel Merino, book editor. 260 $a Detroit : $b Greenhaven Press, $c c2010. 263 $a 1005 300 $a 190 p. ; $c 24 cm. 490 1 $a Issues on trial 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 505 0 $a Case overview: Frontiero v. Richardson (1973). The court's decision: differential treatment of men and women is unconstitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- The statute in question treating men and women differently is reasonable / Erwin N. Griswold, Harlington Wood Jr., Mark L. Evans -- The decision in Frontiero was a key step toward equality for women / Christine Basic -- The Frontiero decision helped women achieve equality in the military / Lory Manning -- The reasoning in Frontiero protecting women supports protection of homosexuals / Thomas B. Scheffey -- Case overview: Orr v. Orr (1979). The court's decision: legislation distributing benefits and burdens by gender is unconstitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: no sex discrimination exists for an individual who is not harmed / William H. Rehnquist -- Men receiving alimony still suffer stigmatization years after Orr / Anita Raghavan -- Women are increasingly paying alimony as equality requires / Betsy Schiffman -- Case overview: Johnson v. Transportation Agency (1987). The court's decision: taking account of sex in order to eliminate underrepresentation in employment is constitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: in employment, taking sex into account for any reason is sex discrimination / Antonin Scalia -- Brennanism / Daniel Seligman -- The relevance of Johnson for ad hoc affirmative action is unclear / Michael Starr and Adam J. Heft -- Case overview: Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007). The court's decision: filing for pay discrimination is subject to time limits / Samuel A. Alito Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: current pay disparities between men and women are acts of sex discrimination / Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- Ledbetter was not unjustly decided / Stuart Taylor Jr. -- Congress should overturn Ledbetter / Dahlia Lithwick -- The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act will create many problems / Andrew M. Grossman. 650 0 $a Sex discrimination $x Cases $z United States $x Cases $v Juvenile literature. 700 1 $a Merino, NoeÌl. 830 0 $a Issues on trial 941 $a 3 952 $l SAPG074 $d 20160202045102.0 952 $l UQAX771 $d 20100901010429.0 952 $l UTAX115 $d 20100521052014.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=5DBBF21C62A311DFAF3CE96BC41A358D 994 $a 11 $b IOEInitiate Another SILO Locator Search