The Locator -- [(subject = "Coal gasification--United States")]

36 records matched your query       


Record 5 | Previous Record | MARC Display | Next Record | Search Results
Author:
Gaffigan, Mark.
Title:
Clean coal [electronic resource] : DOE should prepare a comprehensive analysis of the relative costs, benefits, and risks of a range of options for FutureGen : testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives / statement of Mark Gaffigan.
Format:
[electronic resource] :
Publisher:
U.S. Govt. Accountability Office,
Copyright Date:
2009
Description:
6 p. : digital, PDF file.
Subject:
United States.--Dept. of Energy
Coal gasification--United States.
Coal gasification plants--United States.
Carbon sequestration--United States.
Energy development--United States.
Coal--United States.
Other Authors:
United States. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment House. Committee on Science and Technology (2007). Subcommittee on Energy and Environment
United States. Government Accountability Office
Notes:
Title from title screen (viewed Mar. 12, 2009). "For release ... March 11, 2009." Paper version available from: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 441 G St., NW, Rm. LM, Washington, D.C. 20548. Includes bibliographical references.
Summary:
This testimony discusses our recent report on the Department of Energy's (DOE) decision to restructure the FutureGen program. The original FutureGen plant was to capture and store underground about 90 percent of its CO2 emissions. DOE's cost share was to be 74 percent, and industry partners agreed to fund the rest. Concerned about escalating costs, DOE announced in January 2008 that it had decided to restructure FutureGen. In October 2008, DOE received a small number of applications for the restructured FutureGen; however, some of these applications were for proposals outside the restructured FutureGen's scope. As we reported, DOE is currently assessing proposals received and stated it expected to announce a selection of projects by December 2008; however, as of the beginning of March 2009, it had made no decision. DOE requested supplemental information from restructured FutureGen applicants, which will be reviewed before any selection decision. As Congress may know, the recently enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, known as the stimulus law, provides DOE an additional $3.4 billion for "Fossil Energy Research and Development." Such a substantial amount of funding could significantly impact DOE's decisions about how to move forward with programs such as FutureGen.
Series:
Testimony ; GAO-09-465T
OCLC:
(OCoLC)314365305
Locations:
USUX851 -- Iowa State University - Parks Library (Ames)

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.