The Locator -- [(subject = "Judge-made law")]

102 records matched your query       


Record 4 | Previous Record | MARC Display | Next Record | Search Results
Author:
Scalia, Antonin, author.
Title:
A matter of interpretation : federal courts and the law : an essay / by Antonin Scalia ; with commentary by Amy Gutmann, editor, Gordon S. Wood, Laurence H. Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, Ronald Dworkin ; with a new introduction by Akhil Reed Amar ; and a new afterword by Steven G. Calabresi.
Edition:
New edition.
Publisher:
Princeton Univ Press,
Copyright Date:
2017
Description:
xxiv, 173 pages ; 22 cm.
Subject:
Constitutional law--United States--Criticism and interpretation.
Judge-made law--United States.
Law--United States--Criticism and interpretation.
Other Authors:
Gutmann, Amy, editor.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents:
Afterword to the new edition / Introduction to the new edition / Steven G. Calabresi. Response / Antonin Scalia -- Comment / Gordon S. Wood -- Comment / Laurence H. Tribe -- Comment / Mary Ann Glendon -- Response / Antonin Scalia -- Afterword to the new edition / Steven G. Calabresi.
Summary:
"In exploring the neglected art of statutory interpretation, Scalia urges that judges resist the temptation to use legislative intention and legislative history. In his view, it is incompatible with democratic government to allow the meaning of a statute to be determined by what the judges think the lawgivers meant rather than by what the legislature actually promulgated. Eschewing the judicial lawmaking that is the essence of common law, judges should interpret statutes and regulations by focusing on the text itself. Scalia then extends this principle to constitutional law. He proposes that we abandon the notion of an everchanging Constitution and pay attention to the Constitution's original meaning. Although not subscribing to the 'strict constructionism' that would prevent applying the Constitution to modern circumstances, Scalia emphatically rejects the idea that judges can properly 'smuggle' in new rights or deny old rights by using the Due Process Clause, for instance. In fact, such judicial discretion might lead to the destruction of the Bill of Rights if a majority of the judges ever wished to reach that most undesirable of goals. This essay is followed by four commentaries by Professors Gordon Wood, Laurence Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin, who engage Justice Scalia's ideas about judicial interpretation from varying standpoints. In the spirit of debate, Justice Scalia responds to these critics."-- Provided by publisher.
ISBN:
9780691174044
0691174040
OCLC:
(OCoLC)945482952
LCCN:
2017953346
Locations:
TYPH572 -- Cedar Rapids Public Library (Cedar Rapids)
YEPF572 -- Marion Public Library (Marion)
PQAX094 -- Wartburg College - Vogel Library (Waverly)

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.