The Locator -- [(subject = "United States--Constitution 1st Amendment")]

255 records matched your query       


Record 20 | Previous Record | MARC Display | Next Record | Search Results
Author:
Barbas, Samantha, author.
Title:
The rise and fall of group libel : the forgotten campaign for hate speech laws / Samantha Barbas.
Publisher:
Loyola University School of Law,
Copyright Date:
2022
Description:
pages 297-340 ; 29 cm
Subject:
United States.--Constitution.--1st Amendment
Hate speech--United States--History--20th century.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references. Offprint: Loyola University of Chicago law journal. Volume 54, number 1 (Fall 2022)
Summary:
"It is well-known that there is no "hate speech" law in the United States. This has been criticized, especially given the existence of robust hate speech laws in other nations. The absence of hate speech laws in American law has been attributed to legal, cultural, and historical factors, including speech protective First Amendment jurisprudence and long-standing skepticism of group reputation as an interest worthy of legal protection. This Article presents another reason for the absence of hate speech laws in America: the failure of a large-scale social movement in the 1940s to pass hate speech laws or "group libel" laws, as they were known. For over a decade, activists called for legislation that would impose civil liability and criminal punishment for speech that disparaged racial and religious groups. This movement was a response to the proliferation of anti-Semitic and fascist hate groups in the U.S. before and during the Second World War. Existing libel laws, which addressed the defamation of individuals, were inadequate to address the problem of group defamation. The movement to pass state and federal group libel laws produced a robust national dialogue on the problem of hate speech in the 1940s, but little in the way of actual law. The "group libel law movement" rose and fell quickly, declining-ironically-just before the Supreme Court issued its 1952 decision in Beauharnais v. Illinois, approving the constitutionality of an Illinois group libel law. By that time, the movement for group libel laws had dissipated, and many onetime proponents of such laws rejected them. The Beauharais decision led to no new group libel laws, in part because there were few remaining advocates to promote them. Had the group libel law movement persisted, the United States might have taken a different approach to the regulation of hate speech."
OCLC:
(OCoLC)1443537695
Locations:
OVUX522 -- University of Iowa Libraries (Iowa City)

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.