The Locator -- [(subject = "Feminism--United States--History--20th century")]

115 records matched your query       


Record 20 | Previous Record | MARC Display | Next Record | Search Results
Title:
Feminist judgments : rewritten opinions of the United States Supreme Court / edited by Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger, and Bridget J. Crawford.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press,
Copyright Date:
2016
Description:
xlvii, 566 pages ; 23 cm.
Subject:
Etats-Unis.--Supreme Court--fre.
Women--Legal status, laws, etc.--United States--Cases.
Feminist jurisprudence--United States--Cases.
Equality before the law--United States--Cases.
Discrimination--Law and legislation--United States--Cases.
Feminism--United States--History--20th century.
Discrimination--Law and legislation.
Equality before the law.
Feminism.
Feminist jurisprudence.
Women--Legal status, laws, etc.
United States.
Etats-Unis.
1900 - 1999
History.
Trials, litigation, etc.
Other Authors:
Stanchi, Kathryn M., editor. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2016008561
Berger, Linda L., editor. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2016008536
Crawford, Bridget J., editor. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2004095121
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents:
Introduction to the U.S. Feminist Judgments Project / Erez Aloni, Carlos A. Ball. Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) / Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol -- Bradwell v. Illinois, 83 U.S. 130 (1873) / Kimberly Holst, Phyllis Goldfarb -- Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) / Andrea Doneff, Pamela Laufer-Ukeles -- Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) / Cynthia Hawkins DeBose, Laura Rosenbury -- Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) / Inga N. Laurent, Teri McMurtry-Chubb -- Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972) / Nancy D. Polikoff, Karen Syma Czapanskiy -- Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) / Rachel Rebouche, Kimberly M. Mutcherson -- Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973) / Iselin M. Gambert, Dara E. Purvis -- Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484 (1974) / Maya Manian, Lucinda M. Finley -- Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977) / Brenda A. Smith, Maria L. Ontiveros -- City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978) / Cassandra Jones Havard, Tracy A. Thomas -- Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980) / Mary Ziegler, Leslie C. Griffin -- Michael M. v. Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464 (1981) / Margo Kaplan, Cynthia Godsoe -- Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981) / Jamie R. Abrams, Davis S. Cohen -- Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986) / Kristen Konrad Tiscione, Angela Onwuachi-Willig -- Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987) / Deborah Gordon, Deborah L. Rhode -- Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989) / Dale Margolin Cecka, Martha Chamallas -- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) / Macarena Saez, Lisa R. Pruitt -- United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) / Christine M. Venter, Valorie K. Vojdik -- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998) / Margaret E. Johnson, Ann C. McGinley -- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 524 U.S. 274 (1998) / Michelle S. Simon, Ann Bartow -- United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000) / Shaakirrah R. Sanders, Anibal Rosario Lebron -- Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. 53 (2001) / Sandra S. Park, Ilene Durst -- Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) / Kris McDaniel-Miccio, Ruthann Robson -- Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005) / Patricia A. Broussard, Maria Isabel Medina -- Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) / Erez Aloni, Carlos A. Ball.
Summary:
"What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were written with a feminist perspective? Feminist Judgments brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, the most significant U.S. Supreme Court cases on gender from the 1800s to the present day. The twenty-five opinions in this volume demonstrate that judges with feminist viewpoints could have changed the course of the law. The rewritten decisions reveal that previously accepted judicial outcomes were not necessary or inevitable and demonstrate that feminist reasoning increases the judicial capacity for justice. Feminist Judgments opens a path for a long overdue discussion of the real impact of judicial diversity on the law as well as the influence of perspective on judging"--Publisher's website.
Series:
Feminist judgments series
ISBN:
110756560X
9781107565609
1107126622
9781107126626
OCLC:
(OCoLC)940342395
LCCN:
2016008441
Locations:
PLAX964 -- Luther College - Preus Library (Decorah)
OVUX522 -- University of Iowa Libraries (Iowa City)

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.