Feminist judgments : immigration law opinions rewritten / edited by Kathleen Kim, LMU Loyola Law School, Los Angeles; Kevin Lapp, LMU Loyola Law School, Los Angeles; Jennifer J. Lee, Temple University, Beasley School of Law.
Introduction -- Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, and Jennifer J. Lee -- Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875) / Commentary : Julie Dahlstrom, Judgment : Stewart Chang -- Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U.S. 651 (1892) / Commentary : Eunice C. Lee, Judgment : Stella Burch Elias -- United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) / Commentary : Rachel Rosenbloom, Judgment : Jonathan Weinberg -- United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923) / Commentary : Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Judgment : Joy Kanwar -- Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982) / Commentary : Sabrina Balgamwalla, Judgment : Erin Corcoran -- Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S 202 (1982) / Commentary : Michael Olivas, Judgment : Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia -- Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846 (1985) / Commentary : Raymond Audain, Judgment : Patricia Winograd -- Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993) / Commentary : Lindsay Harris, Judgment : Julia Hernandez -- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) / Commentary : Nicole Hallett, Judgment : Stacy Caplow and Maryellen Fullerton -- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002) / Commentary : Ruben Garcia, Judgment : Kati Griffith -- Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010) / Commentary : Jack Chin, Judgment: Marissa Montes -- Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012) / Commentary : Kristina Campbell, Judgment : Annie Lai -- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018) / Commentary : Ahilan Arulanantham, Judgment : Sarah Sherman-Stokes and Sarah Schendel -- Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020) / Commentary : Kevin Johnson, Judgment : Jennifer Lee Koh.
Summary:
"Offers a novel contribution to immigration legal scholarship by rewriting Supreme Court immigration law opinions from a critical immigration legal theory lens. Contests fundamental presumptions in doctrinal immigration law and shows how entrenched system of power, alongside racism, sexism, and stereotypes, have marred the immigration law landscape"-- Provided by publisher.
This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.