183 records matched your query
03749aam a2200337 a 4500 001 9457061CED2F11E78644BA0B97128E48 003 SILO 005 20171230010220 008 120604t20132013nyu b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2012022806 020 $a 0195342070 020 $a 9780195342079 035 $a (OCoLC)794838540 040 $a DLC $b eng $c DLC $d YDX $d BTCTA $d YDXCP $d OCLCO $d BWX $d GZL $d CGU $d WLL $d MUU $d CDX $d IaU-L $d UtOrBLW $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- $0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/geographicAreas/n-us 050 00 $a KF8750 $b .R53 2013 $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/classification/K 082 00 $a 347.73/8 $2 23 100 1 $a Richman, William M. $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84105600 245 10 $a Injustice on appeal : $b The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis / $c William M. Richman, William L. Reynolds. 264 1 $a New York : $b Oxford University Press, $c [2013] 300 $a xiii, 237 pages ; $c 25 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 520 $a "The United States Circuit Courts of Appeals are among the most important governmental institutions in our society. However, because the Supreme Court can hear less than 150 cases per year, the Circuit Courts (with a combined caseload of over 60,000) are, for practical purposes, the courts of last resort for all but a tiny fraction of federal court litigation. Thus, their significance, both for ultimate dispute resolution and for the formation and application of federal law, cannot be overstated. Yet, in the last forty years, a dramatic increase in caseload and a systemic resistance to an increased judgeship have led to a crisis. Signed published opinions form only a small percentage of dispositions; judges confer on fifty routine cases in an afternoon; and most litigants are denied oral argument completely. In Injustice on Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis, William M. Richman and William L. Reynolds chronicle the transformation of the United States Circuit Courts; consider the merits and dangers of continued truncating procedures; catalogue and respond to the array of specious arguments against increasing the size of the judiciary; and consider several ways of reorganizing the circuit courts so that they can dispense traditional high quality appellate justice even as their caseloads and the number of appellate judgeships increase. The work serves as an analytical capstone to the authors' thirty years of research on the issue and will constitute a powerful piece of advocacy for a more responsible and egalitarian approach to caseload glut facing the circuit courts"--Publisher's website. 505 0 $a A brief history of the circuit courts -- The publication plans -- The premises of the argument for limited publication -- The counter-arguments -- The life and death of the no-citation rules -- The Constitution and unpublished opinions -- Restricting oral argument -- Additional decision makers : deciding by bureaucracy -- The cumulative effect of the appellate triage regime -- Commissions, studies, reports, and proposals -- The obvious solution and the judicial opposition -- The need for a small federal judiciary : reasons, arguments, and refutations -- Jurisdictional retrenchment : of babies and bath water -- Elitism and diversity. 650 0 $a Appellate courts $z United States. $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2007101194 650 0 $a Appellate procedure $z United States. $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2007101195 700 1 $a Reynolds, William L., $d 1945- $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n80027280 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20171230015038.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=9457061CED2F11E78644BA0B97128E48Initiate Another SILO Locator Search