335 records matched your query
03416aam a2200457 i 4500 001 F3FE07789F4211EBBB7E29A634ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20210417010108 008 181003s2019 ne b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2018047461 020 $a 9004384669 020 $a 9789004384668 035 $a (OCoLC)1056204179 040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d OCLCF $d YDX $d OCLCO $d QGJ $d GUL $d CHVBK $d OCLCO $d OHX $d OCLCA $d OCL $d OCLCA $d UtOrBLW $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a e------ $0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/geographicAreas/e 050 00 $a KJE6471 $b .M53 2019 $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/classification/K 100 1 $a MickonyteÌ, AisteÌ, $e author. $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2018057618 245 10 $a Presumption of innocence in EU anti-cartel enforcement / $c by Aiste Mickonyte. 246 3 $a Presumption of innocence in European Union anti-cartel enforcement 264 1 $a Leiden ; $b Brill Nijhoff, $c [2019] 300 $a xiv, 234 pages ; $c 25 cm. 490 1 $a Nijhoff studies in European union law ; $v Volume 15 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 197-226) and index. 505 0 $a Introduction -- Functions of the presumption of innocence -- Presumption of innocence under article 6(2) ECHR : meaning and scope -- Legal framework of EU anti-cartel enforcement procedure -- Classification of EU anti-cartel proceedings -- Parental liability : compliance with article 6(2) ECHR -- Duty of cooperation : compliance with nemo tenetur under article 6(2) ECHR -- Proposals for improvement -- Conclusions. 520 8 $a In this monograph, AisteÌ MickonyteÌ examines the compliance of the European anti-cartel enforcement procedure with the presumption of innocence under Article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The author maintains that the pursuit of manifestly severe punishment with insistence of the European Commission on administrative-level procedural safeguards is inconsistent with the robust standards of protection under the Convention. Arguing that EU anti-cartel procedure is criminal within the meaning of the Convention, this work considers this procedure in light of the core elements of the presumption of innocence such as the burden of proof and the principle of fault. The author zeroes in on the de facto automatic liability of parental companies for offences committed by their subsidiaries.-- $c Publisher's website. 630 00 $a Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms $d (1950 November 5) $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79043274 630 07 $a Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01813685 610 27 $a EuropaÌische Union. $2 gnd 650 0 $a Cartels $z European Union countries. 650 0 $a Presumption of innocence $z European Union countries. 650 7 $a Cartels. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00847991 650 7 $a Presumption of innocence. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01076079 651 7 $a European Union countries. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01269470 650 7 $a BekaÌmpfung. $2 gnd 650 7 $a Kartell. $2 gnd 650 7 $a Kartellrecht. $2 gnd 830 0 $a Nijhoff studies in EU law ; $v v. 15. $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2012024382 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20231018012209.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=F3FE07789F4211EBBB7E29A634ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search