41 records matched your query
03051aam a2200409 i 4500 001 F2E53782477411EC81CA9FE82DECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20211117010121 008 201223t20212021enk b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2020058039 020 $a 1108794882 020 $a 9781108794886 020 $a 110884149X 020 $a 9781108841498 035 $a (OCoLC)1228911171 040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d YDX $d OCLCF $d UKMGB $d YDX $d GWL $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a e-uk-en 050 00 $a K588 $b .D89 2021 100 1 $a Duxbury, Neil, $e author. 245 14 $a The intricacies of dicta and dissent / $c Neil Duxbury, London School of Economics and Political Science. 264 1 $a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2021. 300 $a xxv, 260 pages ; $c 24 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 505 0 $a Introduction -- The civilian dimension -- Case law as common law -- "Obiter" as legal entity -- Dicta depicted -- Oblique strategies -- Engines of confusion -- The necessity test -- Cheap talk -- Dicta and dicta -- Nearly law? -- Observation and authority -- The sources problem -- Some preliminary observations on dissent -- The nature of judicial dissent -- Without contraries is no progression? -- Stalemates and motivations -- Dissents, decisions, and courts -- The tug of unanimity in England's courts -- Dissent in an apex court -- When is a dissent not a dissent? -- Minorities as authorities -- Are we agreed? 520 $a "Introduction: We digress when, in intending to make a point, we either temporarily or permanently deviate from it. Digressions can be deliberate or unconscious. They can be to good or bad - or a mixture of good and bad - or to no effect. Distinguishing the digressive from the non-digressive is not always straightforward: comments offered as asides can strike at the very heart of a matter, just as narrative which a reader thinks peripheral might be the author's fil conducteur. Common-law judges often digress in the course of making legal decisions. The standard characterization of these digressions is that they are observations which are not integral to a decision that has been reached - that they could be taken out of a judgment without that judgment being undermined. The full legal Latin term for these observations is obiter dicta"-- $c Provided by publisher. 650 0 $a Common law $x Methodology. 650 0 $a Dissenting opinions. 650 0 $a Judicial process $z England. 650 7 $a Dissenting opinions. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00895422 650 7 $a Judicial process. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00984705 651 7 $a England. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01219920 653 $a Obiter dictum 776 08 $i Online version: $a Duxbury, Neil. $t The intricacies of dicta and dissent $d Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2021 $z 9781108882590 $w (DLC) 2020058040 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20220526020304.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=F2E53782477411EC81CA9FE82DECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search