36 records matched your query
03849aam a2200493 a 4500 001 77C4BD3CFE5F11E2B6A414D3DAD10320 003 SILO 005 20130806010419 006 m d f 007 cr mn||||||||| 008 090312s2009 dcu sb f000 0 eng c 035 $a (OCoLC)314365305 040 $a EJB $c EJB $d ESR $d GPO $d MvI $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 074 $a 0546-D-01 (online) 086 0 $a GA 1.5/2:GAO-09-465 T 100 1 $a Gaffigan, Mark. 245 10 $a Clean coal $h [electronic resource] : $b DOE should prepare a comprehensive analysis of the relative costs, benefits, and risks of a range of options for FutureGen : testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives / $c statement of Mark Gaffigan. 246 3 $a Clean coal : $b Department of Energy should prepare a comprehensive analysis of the relative costs, benefits, and risks of a range of options for FutureGen 246 30 $a DOE should prepare a comprehensive analysis of the relative costs, benefits, and risks of a range of options for FutureGen 246 17 $a FutureGen 260 $a [Washington, D.C.] : $b U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, $c [2009] 300 $a 6 p. : $b digital, PDF file. 490 1 $a Testimony ; $v GAO-09-465T 538 $a Mode of access: Internet from GAO web site. Address as of 3/12/09: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09465t.pdf ; current access available via PURL. 500 $a Title from title screen (viewed Mar. 12, 2009). 500 $a "For release ... March 11, 2009." 500 $a Paper version available from: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 441 G St., NW, Rm. LM, Washington, D.C. 20548. 520 $a This testimony discusses our recent report on the Department of Energy's (DOE) decision to restructure the FutureGen program. The original FutureGen plant was to capture and store underground about 90 percent of its CO2 emissions. DOE's cost share was to be 74 percent, and industry partners agreed to fund the rest. Concerned about escalating costs, DOE announced in January 2008 that it had decided to restructure FutureGen. In October 2008, DOE received a small number of applications for the restructured FutureGen; however, some of these applications were for proposals outside the restructured FutureGen's scope. As we reported, DOE is currently assessing proposals received and stated it expected to announce a selection of projects by December 2008; however, as of the beginning of March 2009, it had made no decision. DOE requested supplemental information from restructured FutureGen applicants, which will be reviewed before any selection decision. As Congress may know, the recently enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, known as the stimulus law, provides DOE an additional $3.4 billion for "Fossil Energy Research and Development." Such a substantial amount of funding could significantly impact DOE's decisions about how to move forward with programs such as FutureGen. 504 $a Includes bibliographical references. 610 10 $a United States. $b Dept. of Energy 650 0 $a Coal gasification $z United States. 650 0 $a Coal gasification plants $z United States. 650 0 $a Carbon sequestration $z United States. 650 0 $a Energy development $z United States. 650 0 $a Coal $z United States. 710 1 $a United States. $b Subcommittee on Energy and Environment $b House. $b Committee on Science and Technology (2007). $b Subcommittee on Energy and Environment 710 1 $a United States. $b Government Accountability Office 830 0 $a Testimony $v GAO-09-465T. 856 40 $u http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS112983 941 $a 1 952 $l USUX851 $d 20160824093649.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=77C4BD3CFE5F11E2B6A414D3DAD10320Initiate Another SILO Locator Search