233 records matched your query
03817aam a2200517 i 4500 001 0EFCE3E671B711EB8A4F4B2E3BECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20210218010021 008 200422t20202020ksu b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2020013713 020 $a 0700630198 020 $a 9780700630196 035 $a (OCoLC)1152384791 040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d BDX $d YDX $d OCLCF $d GWL $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a KF8748 $b .P387 2020 100 1 $a Peretti, Terri Jennings, $d 1956- $e author. 245 10 $a Partisan supremacy : $b how the GOP enlisted courts to rig America's election rules / $c Terri Jennings Peretti. 264 1 $a Lawrence, Kansas : $b University Press of Kansas, $c [2020] 300 $a 360 pages ; $c 24 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 295-336) and index. 505 0 $a Understanding judicial partisanship -- Courts, parties, and the Voting Rights Act -- Courts, parties, and voter identification -- Courts, parties, and redistricting -- Courts, parties, and campaign finance. 520 $a "With the Supreme Court now firmly in the hands of the conservatives, the fog of judicial politics hangs over every decision. In this timely study, Terri Peretti examines Republican influence in judicial decisions, looking particularly at the increasing number of cases concerning elections and voting. Peretti focuses individual chapters around the Voting Rights Act (Shelby County v. Holder), voter identification litigation (Crawford v. Marion County Election Board), redistricting (gerrymandering), and cases pertaining to campaign finance, including Citizens United, McCutcheon, and Janus. The book's title references a famous conversation between President Grover Cleveland and a fellow Democrat, Congressman Timothy Campbell. In response to Cleveland's reluctance to support a bill because of its doubtful constitutionality, the congressman quipped 'What's the Constitution between friends?' This suggestion of inter-branch partisan collusion in constitutional decision making violates core normative beliefs about courts. We expect that judges can rise above the partisan fray and, particularly when the stakes for democracy are so high, will neutrally police the election process. Challenges to these expectations deserve close scrutiny and have prompted this book's chief aim: to test whether judges act as friendly partisans or as neutral arbiters when deciding election law cases"-- $c Provided by the publisher. 610 10 $a United States. $b Supreme Court. 610 20 $a Republican Party (U.S. : 1854- ) 610 27 $a Republican Party (U.S. : 1854- ) $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00544975 610 17 $a United States. $b Supreme Court. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 650 0 $a Political questions and judicial power $z United States. 650 0 $a Judicial process $z United States. 650 0 $a Voter registration $z United States. 650 0 $a Apportionment (Election law) $z United States. 650 0 $a Partisanship $x Political aspects $z United States. 650 0 $a Campaign funds $x Law and legislation $z United States. 651 0 $a United States $x Politics and government. 650 7 $a Apportionment (Election law) $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00811773 650 7 $a Campaign funds $x Law and legislation. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00844852 650 7 $a Judicial process. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00984705 650 7 $a Political questions and judicial power. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01069674 650 7 $a Politics and government. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01919741 650 7 $a Voter registration. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01169215 651 7 $a United States. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 941 $a 2 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20231021014430.0 952 $l USUX851 $d 20211102014120.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=0EFCE3E671B711EB8A4F4B2E3BECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search