921 records matched your query
03396aam a2200433 i 4500 001 0A460136177D11EC850ADFAD22ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20210917010313 008 201015t20212021enk b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2020046886 020 $a 1108723489 020 $a 9781108723480 020 $a 1108484700 020 $a 9781108484701 035 $a (OCoLC)1198559306 040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d OCLCF $d UKMGB $d UOL $d YDX $d WLL $d OCLCO $d GUL $d OCLCO $d SILO 042 $a pcc 050 00 $a K5103 $b .C369 2021 100 1 $a Caruso, Gregg D., $e author. 245 10 $a Rejecting retributivism : $b free will, punishment, and criminal justice / $c Gregg D. Caruso, State University of New York Corning. 264 1 $a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2021. 300 $a ix, 389 pages ; $c 24 cm. 490 1 $a Law and the cognitive sciences 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 329-383) and index. 505 0 $a Free will, legal punishment, and retributivism -- Free will skepticism : hard Incompatibilism and hard luck -- The epistemic argument against retributivism -- Additional reasons for rejecting retributivism -- Consequentialist, educational, and mixed theories of punishment -- The public health-quarantine model I : a nonretributive approach to criminal behavior -- The public health-quarantine model II : the social determinants of health and criminal behavior -- Public health-quarantine model III : human dignity, victims' rights, rehabilitation, and preemptive incapacitation -- Public health-quarantine model IV : funishment, deterrence, evidentiary standards, and indefinite detention. 520 $a "Within the criminal justice system one of the most prominent justifications for legal punishment, both historically and currently, is retributivism. The retributive justification of legal punishment maintains that, absent any excusing conditions, wrongdoers are morally responsible for their actions and deserve to be punished in proportion to their wrongdoing. Unlike theories of punishment that aim at deterrence, rehabilitation, or incapacitation, retributivism grounds punishment in the blameworthiness and desert of offenders. It holds that punishing wrongdoers is intrinsically good. For the retributivist, wrongdoers deserve a punitive response proportional to their wrongdoing, even if their punishment serves no further purpose. This means that the retributivist position is not reducible to consequentialist considerations nor in justifying punishment does it appeal to wider goods such as the safety of society or the moral improvement of those being punished"-- $c Provided by publisher. 650 0 $a Lex talionis. 650 0 $a Punishment $x Philosophy. 650 0 $a Criminal justice, Administration of $x Philosophy. 650 0 $a Free will and determinism $x Philosophy. 650 7 $a Criminal justice, Administration of $x Philosophy. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00883291 650 7 $a Free will and determinism $x Philosophy. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00933972 650 7 $a Lex talionis. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00997009 650 7 $a Punishment $x Philosophy. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01084116 776 08 $i ebook version : $z 9781108754804 830 0 $a Law and the cognitive sciences. 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20231021015247.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=0A460136177D11EC850ADFAD22ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search