The Locator -- [(subject = "Courts--United States--History")]

67 records matched your query       


Record 18 | Previous Record | Long Display | Next Record
02766aam a2200397 a 4500
001 AF73C5C6FC4F11DF927F57F86AFF544E
003 SILO
005 20101130010137
008 100423s2010    enka     b    001 0 eng  
010    $a 2010017721
020    $a 0511750250 (e-book)
020    $a 9780511750250 (e-book)
020    $a 0521767083 (hardback)
020    $a 9780521767088 (hardback)
035    $a (OCoLC)609872272
040    $a DLC $c DLC $d SILO $d YDXCP $d UKM $d BTCTA $d BWX $d CDX $d COO $d UCDLL $d PUL $d SILO
042    $a pcc
043    $a n-us---
050 00 $a KF4819 $b .L39 2010
050 00 $a KF4819 $b .L39 2010
100 1  $a Law, Anna O., $d 1970-
245 1  $a The immigration battle in American courts / $c Anna O. Law.
260    $a Cambridge ; $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2010.
300    $a xiii, 266 p. : $b ill. ; $c 24 cm.
504    $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0  $a Introduction -- How do we know what we know? Data, methods, and initial findings -- The rise of two courts with differentiated functions -- Interstitial policy making in the U.S. courts of appeals -- Institutional growth and innovation : the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and immigration -- Continuity amid change : the federal courts' commitment to due process -- Conclusion.
520    $a "This book assesses the role of the federal judiciary in immigration and the institutional evolution of the Supreme Court and the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Neither court has played a static role across time. By the turn of the century, a division of labor had developed between the two courts whereby the Courts of Appeals retained their original function as error-correction courts, while the Supreme Court was reserved for the most important policy and political questions. Anna O. Law explores the consequences of this division for immigrant litigants, who are more likely to prevail in the Courts of Appeals because of advantageous institutional incentives that increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome. As this book proves, it is inaccurate to speak of an undifferentiated institution called "the federal courts" or "the courts," for such characterizations elide important differences in mission and function of the two highest courts in the federal judicial hierarchy"-- $c Provided by publisher.
650  0 $a Emigration and immigration law $z United States $x History.
610 10 $a United States. $b Supreme Court $x History.
650  0 $a Appellate courts $z United States $x History.
650  0 $a Judgments $z United States $x History.
941    $a 3
952    $l IBAX173 $d 20180307023403.0
952    $l OVUX522 $d 20180110050037.0
952    $l OIAX792 $d 20101130010418.0
956    $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=AF73C5C6FC4F11DF927F57F86AFF544E

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.