27 records matched your query
03081aam a2200385 i 4500 001 A3771912E9E711E69A6025A3DAD10320 003 SILO 005 20170203020341 008 151112t20162016wiu b 001 0 eng c 010 $a 2015043760 020 $a 0299308804 (hbk. : alk. paper) 020 $a 9780299308803 (hbk. : alk. paper) 035 $a (OCoLC)931860527 040 $a WU/DLC $b eng $e rda $c GZM $d DLC $d YDXCP $d BTCTA $d BDX $d OCLCF $d GWL $d VFL $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a KF4850 G74 2016 100 1 $a Gregory, Anthony, $d 1981- $e author. 245 10 $a American surveillance : $b intelligence, privacy, and the Fourth Amendment / $c Anthony Gregory. 264 1 $a Madison, Wisconsin : $b The University of Wisconsin Press, $c [2016] 300 $a xiii, 263 pages ; $c 24 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 233-245) and index. 505 0 $a Reconnoitering the frontier, 1775-1899 -- Foreign influences, 1900-1945 -- Espionage and subversion, 1946-1978 -- Calm before the storm, 1979-2000 -- The total information idea, 2001-2015 -- Unreasonable searches -- Fourth Amendment mirage -- Enforcement problems -- The privacy question. 520 $a Some see domestic intelligence gathering as a crucial task of national security, regardless of personal privacy. Others warn against a surveillance state that tramples constitutional rights. The idea of a total information state has both inspired and frightened Americans. In confronting these controversies, people appeal to law, liberty, or foreign policy to argue for or against surveilling the citizenry. The polarizing topics of surveillance, intelligence, privacy, and Fourth Amendment protections often produce more heat than light. Anthony Gregory offers a nuanced history and analysis of these vexing questions. He highlights the complex relationships between foreign and domestic intelligence, and between national security surveillance and countervailing efforts to safeguard individual privacy. The Fourth Amendment prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures offers no panacea, he finds, in combating assaults on privacy--whether by the NSA, the FBI, local police, or more mundane administrative agencies. And, he notes, some of the high-stakes issues provoked by intelligence methods have little to do with privacy. Given the advancement of technology, together with the ambiguities and practical problems of Fourth Amendment enforcement, Gregory emphasizes that privacy advocates need to consider multiple policy fronts. -- Provided by publisher. 650 0 $a Domestic intelligence $z United States. 650 0 $a Privacy, Right of $z United States. 650 0 $a Electronic surveillance $z United States. 610 10 $a United States. $t Constitution. $n 4th Amendment. 941 $a 4 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20191214015423.0 952 $l USUX851 $d 20180403015915.0 952 $l SOAX911 $d 20170804010612.0 952 $l UQAX771 $d 20170422011428.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=A3771912E9E711E69A6025A3DAD10320 994 $a C0 $b IWAInitiate Another SILO Locator Search