The Locator -- [(subject = "Freedom of speech")]

1443 records matched your query       


Record 14 | Previous Record | Long Display | Next Record
02795aam a22003978i 4500
001 62B159EC7A0E11EE96FE52224AECA4DB
003 SILO
005 20231103010033
008 230601s2023    nyu           000 0 eng  
010    $a 2023026350
020    $a 0197699650
020    $a 9780197699652
020    $a 0197699642
020    $a 9780197699645
035    $a (OCoLC)1381680216
040    $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d BDX $d OCLCF $d YDX $d OCLCO $d UKMGB $d SILO
042    $a pcc
043    $a n-us---
050 00 $a KF4772 S77 2023
100 1  $a Strossen, Nadine, $e author.
245 10 $a Free speech : $b what everyone needs to know / $c Nadine Strossen.
264  1 $a New York : $b Oxford University Press, $c 2023.
300    $a 256 pages ; $c 21 cm
490 0  $a What everyone needs to know; $v vol. 1
505 0  $a Overview of free speech fundamentals -- The most important arguments for and against free speech -- Free speech rights that the First Amendment protects -- First Amendment standards for determining which speech restrictions are (im)permissible -- Speech restrictions that the First Amendment bars or strictly limits -- First Amendment rights in specific government institutions, such as public schools and universities -- Other legal protections for free speech, in addition to the First Amendment -- Important current free speech issues.
520    $a "This book explains the key principles of modern First Amendment law, showing that it embodies universal values and is eminently sensible; it lets government outlaw the most dangerous speech - speech that directly causes or threatens imminent harm, such as intentional incitement of imminent violence -- while outlawing the most dangerous censorship - restrictions on speech solely due to its unpopular or vaguely feared ideas. Before the modern Supreme Court adopted these speech-protective precepts - which are often summarized as the "emergency" and "viewpoint neutrality" principles - the government had discretion to restrict speech with an indirect, speculative connection to potential harm under the "bad tendency" test; it predictably wielded such discretion disproportionately to suppress its critics and advocates of human rights and social justice causes"-- $c Provided by publisher.
650  0 $a Freedom of speech $z United States.
610 10 $a United States. $t Constitution. $n 1st Amendment.
776 08 $i Online version: $a Strossen, Nadine. $t Free speech $d New York : Oxford University Press, 2023 $z 9780197699669 $w (DLC)  2023026351
941    $a 4
952    $l GOPG641 $d 20240409045211.0
952    $l OVUX522 $d 20240217011943.0
952    $l KSPG296 $d 20240201010131.0
952    $l USUX851 $d 20231205011603.0
956    $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=62B159EC7A0E11EE96FE52224AECA4DB
994    $a C0 $b IWA

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.