561 records matched your query
03607aam a2200397 i 4500 001 CA2FE28268DD11EA9C5A9E4D97128E48 003 SILO 005 20200318010024 008 191125s2020 ilu b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2019053883 020 $a 1641055642 020 $a 9781641055642 035 $a (OCoLC)1129397920 040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d OCLCF $d UPM $d WLL $d TLK $d CLU $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a KF8965 $b .Z474 2020 082 00 $a 347.73/67 $2 23 100 1 $a Zervopoulos, John A., $e author. 245 10 $a How to examine mental health experts : $b a family lawyer's handbook of issues and strategies / $c John A. Zervopoulos, Ph.D, J.D. 250 $a Second edition. 264 1 $a Chicago, Illinois : $b American Bar Association, Family Law Section, $c [2020] 300 $a xvi, 252 pages ; $c 23 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 505 0 $a Recommendations : where the rubber meets the road -- Part 4: The PLAN model in action. Daubert's reliability toolbox -- Depositions : should you? -- Courtroom examinations in Daubert hearings and at trial -- The Daubert hearing : challenge or not? -- The Daubert hearing : who has the burden? -- The Daubert challenge -- Defending Daubert : feature Daubert's flexible side -- The trial examination -- Summing up : five keys to manage mental health testimony. $a Step two: Determine whether the expert's mehtods conform to relevant professional standards : methods reliability --Psychological evaluations : more than just testing -- Competent interviews : can you tell? -- Psychological tests and catching lies -- Make sense of computer-based test reports -- Collateral information : uses and abuses -- Let the records show -- Peer into counseling's black box -- Manage experience-based testimony -- Step three: Evaluate the empirical and logical connections between the data arising from the expert's methods and the expert's social science-based conclusions : reasoning realibility -- Mental health testimony = conclusions + opinions -- It's research, but is it relevant? -- DSM-5 diagnoses : what's the problem? -- Recognize and challenge experts' judgment biases -- Step four: Guage the connections between the expert's conclusions and opinions -- The power of words -- A reasonable degree of certainty : magic words?-- $a Recommendations : where the rubber meets the road -- Part 4: The PLAN model in action. Daubert's reliability toolbox -- Depositions : should you? -- Courtroom examinations in Daubert hearings and at trial -- The Daubert hearing : challenge or not? -- The Daubert hearing : who has the burden? -- The Daubert challenge -- Defending Daubert : feature Daubert's flexible side -- The trial examination -- Summing up : five keys to manage mental health testimony. 650 0 $a Evidence, Expert $z United States. 650 0 $a Forensic psychology $z United States. 650 0 $a Examination of witnesses $z United States. 650 7 $a Evidence, Expert. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00917231 650 7 $a Forensic psychology. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00932009 651 7 $a United States. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 710 2 $a American Bar Association. $b Section of Family Law, $e sponsoring body. 775 08 $i Revision of: $a Zervopoulos, John A. $t How to examine mental health experts. $b First edition. $d Chicago, Illinois : American Bar Association, Section of Family Law, [2013] $z 9781614388371 $w (OCoLC)821560854 $w (OCoLC)821560854 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20210721014925.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=CA2FE28268DD11EA9C5A9E4D97128E48Initiate Another SILO Locator Search