311 records matched your query
02831aam a2200505Ia 4500 001 2F052D84E5A311E9B7B99A5997128E48 003 SILO 005 20191003010029 008 190328s2019 dcua b 000 0 eng d 020 $a 0874204267 020 $a 9780874204261 035 $a (OCoLC)1090682527 040 $a YDX $b eng $c YDX $d IAZ $d YDXIT $d OCLCF $d SILO 043 $a n-us-wa $a n-us-va $a n-us-mn $a n-us-ma $a n-us-ca $a n-us-wa 050 4 $a HE308 S36 2019 100 1 $a Schor, Justin B., $e author. 245 10 $a Building a multimodal future : $b connecting real estate development and transportation demand management to ease gridlock / $c Justin B. Schor, Federico Tallis. 260 $a Washington, DC : $b Urban Land Institute, $c ©2019. 300 $a vi, 89 pages : $b illustrations (color) ; $c 28 cm 500 $a Examines 10 communities in the United States ranging in population from 30,000 to several million and in size from six square miles to more than 2,000 square miles. Each community seeks a more dense and mixed-use development. 504 $a Includes bibliographical references. 505 0 $a What is a TDM policy? -- A review of TDM policies -- What best practices should be considered when crafting a TDM policy? -- Steps for establishing a TDM policy in your community -- Detailed case studies of TDM policy by jurisdiction. 520 $a "Across the United States, many communities share a common desire to encourage more dense and mixed-use development, One of the greatest challenges many of them face in getting that kind of development approved is combatting the perception that mixed-use higher densities lead to more cars and traffic congestion. The communities examined in this book have looked to transportation demand management (TDM) to combat that perception and created policies to do so in a variety of ways..."--introduction. 650 0 $a Transportation demand management $x Government policy $z United States. 650 0 $a Real estate development $z United States. 650 0 $a Transportation $z United States $x Planning. 650 0 $a Mixed-use developments $z United States $x Planning. 650 0 $a Traffic congestion $x Management $z United States. 650 0 $a Land use $x Planning. 651 0 $a Arlington County (Va.) 651 0 $a Bloomington (Minn.) 651 0 $a Cambridge (Mass.) 651 0 $a Contra Costa County (Calif.) 651 0 $a Eden Prairie (Minn.) 651 0 $a Fairfax County (Va.) 651 0 $a Lexington (Mass.) 651 0 $a Mountain View (Calif.) 651 0 $a Seattle (Wash.) 651 0 $a Snohomish County (Wash.) 700 1 $a Tallis, Federico, $e author. 710 2 $a Urban Land Institute. 941 $a 1 952 $l USUX851 $d 20200103022805.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=2F052D84E5A311E9B7B99A5997128E48 994 $a C0 $b IWAInitiate Another SILO Locator Search