84 records matched your query
03902aam a2200469 i 4500 001 3139240819C611E7BD0085CCDAD10320 003 SILO 005 20170405010226 008 160726s2016 mau b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2016033965 020 $a 1625342446 020 $a 9781625342447 020 $a 1625342438 020 $a 9781625342430 035 $a (OCoLC)947146618 040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d YDXCP $d BTCTA $d OCLCO $d OCLCF $d OCLCO $d YDX $d OCLCO $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a U264 R83 2016 100 1 $a Rubinson, Paul, $d 1977- $e author. 245 10 $a Redefining science : $b scientists, the national security state, and nuclear weapons in Cold War America / $c Paul Rubinson. 264 1 $a Amherst : $b University of Massachusetts Press, $c [2016] 300 $a xiv, 306 pages ; $c 24 cm. 490 1 $a Culture, politics, and the Cold War 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 505 0 $a Introduction: a tale of two hearings -- From "highly unreliable" to "patriotic and prompt": scientists confront the national security state, 1945/1957 -- Linus Pauling's "science of morality": challenging nuclear weapons, 1950/1963 -- Edward Teller's flexible response: defending nuclear weapons, 1954/1963 -- "Crucified on a cross of atoms": scientists and the Test Ban Treaty, 1957/1963 -- To "sail before the wind of time": scientists and disarmament after the Test Ban Treaty, 1963/1972 -- The dilemmas of Herbert York: opposition in the mainstream, 1952/1981 -- "An elaborate way of committing national suicide": Carl Sagan and nuclear winter, 1980/1989 -- "An emotional grassroots offensive": scientists, SDI, and the moral challenge to nuclear weapons, 1980/1991 -- Conclusion: the future of nuclear weapons. 520 $a "The Cold War forced scientists to reconcile their values of internationalism and objectivity with the increasingly militaristic uses of scientific knowledge. For decades, antinuclear scientists pursued nuclear disarmament in a variety of ways, from grassroots activism to transnational diplomacy and government science advising. The U.S. government ultimately withstood these efforts, redefining science as a strictly technical endeavor that enhanced national security and deeming science that challenged nuclear weapons on moral grounds "emotional" and patently unscientific. In response, many activist scientists restricted themselves to purely technical arguments for arms control. When antinuclear protest erupted in the 1980s, grassroots activists had moved beyond scientific and technical arguments for disarmament. Grounding their stance in the idea that nuclear weapons were immoral, they used the "emotional" arguments that most scientists had abandoned. Redefining Science shows that the government achieved its Cold War "consensus" only by active opposition to powerful dissenters and helps explain the current and uneasy relationship between scientists, the public, and government in debates over issues such as security, energy, and climate change."--Provided by publisher. 650 0 $a Nuclear weapons $x History $z United States $x History $y 20th century. 650 0 $a Science $x Social aspects. 650 0 $a Scientists $z United States $v Biography. 650 0 $a Science and state $z United States $x History $y 20th century. 650 0 $a Nuclear warfare $x History $z United States $x History $y 20th century. 650 0 $a Antinuclear movement $z United States $x History $y 20th century. 650 0 $a Nuclear disarmament $z United States $x History. 650 0 $a National security $z United States $x History $y 20th century. 650 0 $a Cold War. 830 0 $a Culture, politics, and the cold war. 941 $a 2 952 $l UQAX771 $d 20171129010306.0 952 $l USUX851 $d 20170503024056.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=3139240819C611E7BD0085CCDAD10320 994 $a C0 $b IWAInitiate Another SILO Locator Search