Includes bibliographical references (pages 352-372) and index.
Contents:
Michael Walzer and complex equality -- The principle of equal treatment of persons irrespective of gender -- Racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age, and sexual orientation : new statuses, new status rights? -- Nationality discrimination -- Semi-suspect and non-suspect grounds -- Reflections -- Presenting a theory of mediated complexity -- Evaluation.
Summary:
The equality jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union has long drawn criticism for its almost total reliance on Aristotle's doctrine that likes should be treated like, and unlikes unlike. As has often been shown, this is a blunt tool, entrenching assumptions and promoting difference-blindness: the symptoms of simplicity. In this book, Richard Lang proposes that the EU's judges complement the Aristotelian test with a new one based on Michael Walzer's theory of Complex Equality, and illustrates how analysing allegedly discriminatory acts, not in terms of comparisons of the actors involved, but rather in terms of distributions and meanings of goods, would enable them to reach decisions with new dexterity and to resolve conflicts without sacrificing diversity.
This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.