148 records matched your query       

05752aam a2200505Ii 4500
001 23C96EAC6B5411E69AFE1DDBDAD10320
003 SILO
005 20160826010517
008 160328t20162016caua     b    000 0 eng d
020    $a 9780833093134
020    $a 0833093134
035    $a (OCoLC)945641740
040    $a YDXCP $b eng $e rda $c YDXCP $d BDX $d BTCTA $d TXA $d KSG $d COH $d KSU $d IWA $d SILO
043    $a n-us---
050  4 $a UG1523 M35x 2016
100 1  $a McLeod, Gary, $d 1948- $e author.
245 10 $a Enhancing space resilience through non-materiel means / $c Gary McLeod, George Nacouzi, Paul Dreyer, Mel Eisman, Myron Hura, Krista S. Langeland, David Manheim, Geoffrey Torrington ; prepared for the United States Air Force.
264  1 $a Santa Monica, Calif. : $b RAND Corporation, $c [2016]
300    $a xxii, 70 pages : $b color illustrations ; $c 28 cm.
490 1  $a Research report ; $v RR-1067-AF
500    $a "RR-1067-AF"--Cover page 4.
500    $a "RAND Project Air Force" --Title page.
520    $a "Space is now a congested, contested, and competitive environment. Space systems must become more resilient to potential adversary actions and system failures, but changes to space systems are costly. To provide a complete look at resilience and possibly realize some benefit at lower cost, the Air Force asked RAND to identify non-materiel means--doctrine, organization, training, leadership and education, personnel, facilities, and policy--to enhance space resilience over the near and far terms.The authors developed implementation options to improve resilience based on a notional space protection operational concept: enhancing the capability of space operators to respond, in a timely and effective manner, to adversary counterspace actions. Operators need actionable information, appropriate organization and tactics, and dynamic command and control, supported by appropriate tools and decision aids, relevant training and exercises, and qualified personnel brought into the career field. The authors also recommend that Air Force Space Command develop a formal, end-to-end, space protection concept of operations (CONOPS) that captures all elements needed to improve resilience. In addition, the CONOPS could potentially follow the tenet of centralized control and decentralized execution in certain situations, such as when responding to adversary counterspace actions. For the near-term options, the rough order of magnitude (ROM) nonrecurring engineering (NRE) cost of implementation is estimated to be between $2.5 million and $3.6 million. For the far-term options, the ROM NRE cost is estimated to be between $109 million and $166 million, with the ROM recurring cost between $4 million and $5.4 million per year"--Publisher's description.
504    $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-70)
505 00 $t Limited intelligence at SOPS/SWS -- $t Figures -- $t Tables -- $t Summary -- $t Acknowledgments -- $t Abbreviations -- $g 4. $t Introduction: $t Background -- $t Objectives -- $t Scope -- $t Space resilience -- $t Approach -- $t Report structure -- $g 2. $t Resilience and civil institutions: $t General approaches for building resilient operations: $t Impact avoidance -- $t Adaptation and flexibility -- $t Recovery and restoration -- $t Potential applications to the space operations community -- $t Summary -- $g 3. $t Resilience and U.S. government civil space agencies: $t Civil policy considerations: $t Full and open access -- $t Rapid delivery -- $t Continuity of operations -- $t Security classification -- $t Civil practices: $t Information -- $t Organization and tactics -- $t Command and control -- $t Training -- $t Personnel -- $t Summary -- $g 4. $t Resilience and Air Force space operations: $t Operational concept -- $t Findings: information: $t Space order of battle -- $t Limited intelligence at SOPS/SWS --
505 00 $9  $t Far-term recommendations -- $t Space Weather effects -- $t Summary -- $t Findings: organization and tactics: $t Space protection lead -- $t Space protection tactics -- $t Tactics-sharing -- $t Summary -- $t Findings: command and control: $t Satellite C2 contacts -- $t Responsibilities and authorities -- $t Anomaly resolution -- $t Summary -- $t Findings: training: $t Space protection training -- $t Exercises -- $t Multiple satellite C2 systems -- $t Summary -- $t Findings: personnel: $t Initial qualifications -- $t Career progression -- $t Trained operators -- $t Summary -- $t Cost of implementation options -- $t Detailed recommendations -- $g 6. $t Resilience and a world with international and commercial partners: $t Information -- $t Organization and tactics -- $t Command and control -- $g 6. $t Recommendations: $t Overarching recommendations: $t Resilience as a priority -- $t Space protection CONOPS -- $t Detailed recommendations: $t Near-term recommendations -- $t Far-term recommendations --
505 00 $9  $t Space resilience cost analysis. $g Appendix A: $t Space resilience cost analysis.
610 10 $a United States. $b Air Force $x Operational readiness.
650  0 $a Astronautics, Military $z United States $x History $y 21st century.
650  0 $a Space security $x History $y 21st century.
650  0 $a Organizational resilience $x History $y 21st century.
700 1  $a Nacouzi, George, $e author.
700 1  $a Dreyer, Paul, $d 1973- $e author.
700 1  $a Eisman, Mel, $d 1949- $e author.
700 1  $a Hura, Myron, $d 1943- $e author.
700 1  $a Langeland, Krista S., $e author.
700 1  $a Manheim, David, $e author.
700 1  $a Torrington, Geoffrey, $e author.
710 2  $a Project Air Force (U.S.), $e sponsoring body.
710 2  $a Rand Corporation, $e issuing body.
830  0 $a Research report (Rand Corporation) ; $v RR-1067-AF.
941    $a 1
952    $l USUX851 $d 20160826051507.0
956    $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=23C96EAC6B5411E69AFE1DDBDAD10320
994    $a C0 $b IWA