1473 records matched your query
03474aam a2200457 i 4500 001 4923A68C4EAA11EDAB62559A42ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20221018010048 008 210910s2021 cau b 000 0 eng d 020 $a 9781977407801 020 $a 1977407803 035 $a (OCoLC)1272913638 040 $a RSM $b eng $e rda $c RSM $d OCLCO $d BDX $d OCLCF $d YDX $d OCLCO $d SILO 043 $a n-us--- 050 14 $a UG1123 $b .C366 2021 100 1 $a Camm, Frank A., $d 1949- $e author. 245 10 $a Managing intellectual property relevant to operating and sustaining major U.S. Air Force weapon systems / $c Frank Camm, Phillip Carter, Sheng Tao Li, Melissa Shostak. 264 1 $a Santa Monica, CA : $b RAND, $c [2021] 300 $a xiv, 85 pages ; $c 28 cm 520 $a In this report, the authors examine opportunities to improve policy on technical data and data rights associated with operating and sustaining Air Force major weapon systems. Drawing on past RAND Corporation analysis, and the findings of the studies conducted under Sections 809, 813, and 875 of the Fiscal Year 2016 National Defense Authorization Act, the authors identify intellectual property (IP) issues most likely to interest the senior leadership of the Air Force and develop high-level recommendations to address those issues. Among the issues addressed are clarification of the definitions of key types of technical data, creation of an Air Force cadre of specialists on technical data and data rights, and creation of a new form of standard contract that would allow the Air Force and its contractors to negotiate the terms for buying technical data and data rights during a competitive source selection for engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) and then preserve the option to buy data and data rights under those terms over the lifetime of the resulting program. 500 $a "Prepared for the Department of the Air Force." 500 $a "RAND Project AIR FORCE." 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 78-85). 505 0 $a Introduction -- Why Does the Air Force Need Intellectual Property? -- Effort Today to Yield Benefits Elsewhere in the Far Future -- What the Air Force Must Do to Acquire the Technical Data and Data Rights It Needs -- What Can Be Done to Define and Then Sustain a Longer-Term Perspective? -- A Congressionally Mandated Solution: Intellectual Property Cadres -- Long-Term Option Pricing -- Recommendations -- Appendix A. Findings of the Studies Mandated by the Fiscal Year 2016 National Defense Authorization Act Sections 809, 813, and 875. 610 10 $a United States. $b Air Force $x Evaluation. $x Evaluation. 610 10 $a United States. $b Air Force $x Procurement. $x Procurement. 610 17 $a United States. $b Air Force. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00538280 650 0 $a Intellectual property $z United States. 650 7 $a Armed Forces $x Evaluation. $x Evaluation. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01351866 650 7 $a Intellectual property. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00975774 651 7 $a United States. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 710 1 $a United States. $b Department of the Air Force. 710 2 $a Project Air Force (U.S.) 710 2 $a Rand Corporation. 700 1 $a Carter, Phillip, $e author. 700 1 $a Li, Sheng, $e author. 700 1 $a Shostak, Melissa, $e author. 856 41 $u https://doi.org/10.7249/RR4252 941 $a 1 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20231021013325.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=4923A68C4EAA11EDAB62559A42ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search