The Locator -- [(subject = "Human rights")]

11358 records matched your query       


Record 19 | Previous Record | Long Display | Next Record
03269aam a2200409 i 4500
001 DB00FCF896FD11ED8856CD373CECA4DB
003 SILO
005 20230118010046
008 220314s2023    pau      b    001 0 eng  
010    $a 2022011658
020    $a 1512823317
020    $a 9781512823318
035    $a (OCoLC)1310038160
040    $a PU/DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d YDX $d BDX $d OCLCF $d UKMGB $d YDX $d SILO
042    $a pcc
050 00 $a KZ1266 $b .C69 2023
100 1  $a Cowell, Frederick, $e author.
245 10 $a Defensive relativism : $b the use of cultural relativism in international legal practice / $c Frederick Cowell.
264  1 $a Philadelphia : $b University of Pennsylvania Press, $c [2023]
300    $a xi, 314 pages ; $c 24 cm.
490 1  $a Pennsylvania studies in human rights
504    $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
520    $a "Defensive Relativism describes how governments around the world use cultural relativism in legal argument to oppose international human rights law. Defensive relativist arguments appear in international courts, at the committees set up by human rights treaties and at the United Nations Human Rights Council. The aim of defensive relativist arguments is to exempt a state from having to apply international human rights law, or to stop international human rights law evolving, because it would interfere with cultural traditions the state deems important. It is an everyday occurrence in international human rights law and defensive relativist arguments can be used by all sorts of states. The end goal of defensive relativism is to allow a state to appear human rights compliant whilst at the same time not implementing international human rights law. Drawing on a range of materials, such as state reports on the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and cases from European Court of Human Rights involving freedom of religion, this book provides a definitive survey of defensive relativism. Crucially defensive relativism is not about alternate practices of human rights law, or debates about the origins or legitimacy of human rights as a concept. Defensive relativism is instead a variety of tactical argument used by states to justify ignoring international human rights law. Yet as this book concludes, defensive relativism can't be removed from the law as it is a reflection of unresolved tensions about the nature of what it means for rights to be universal"-- $c Provided by publisher.
650  0 $a International law and human rights.
650  0 $a Cultural relativism.
650  0 $a Human rights.
650  2 $a Human Rights $0 (DNLM)D006806
650  6 $a Droit international et droits de l'homme. $0 (CaQQLa)000284659
650  6 $a Relativisme culturel. $0 (CaQQLa)201-0028581
650  6 $a Droits de l'homme (Droit international) $0 (CaQQLa)201-0065399
650  7 $a Cultural relativism. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00885057
650  7 $a Human rights. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst00963285
650  7 $a International law and human rights. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01894145
830  0 $a Pennsylvania studies in human rights.
941    $a 1
952    $l OVUX522 $d 20240717015629.0
956    $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=DB00FCF896FD11ED8856CD373CECA4DB

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.