6 records matched your query
03639cam a2200373 a 4500 001 BA64AC00253811DF9B7CADF9A7D7520A 003 SILO 005 20200815010218 008 091009s2010 miu j b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2009042500 020 $a 0737747412 (hardcover) 020 $a 9780737747416 (hardcover) 035 $a (OCoLC)441153882 040 $a DLC $c DLC $d SILO $d YDXCP $d ILC $d IWD $d SILO 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a HQ767.5.U5 $b A263 2010 245 0 $a Abortion / $c Jean Leverich, book editor. 260 $a Detroit : $b Greenhaven Press, $c c2010. 300 $a 245 p. ; $c 24 cm. 490 1 $a Issues on trial 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (p. 232-236) and index. 505 0 $a Case overview: Roe v. Wade (1973). Majority opinion: The fourteenth amendment protects a woman's right to an abortion / Harry Blackmun -- Dissenting opinion: The life of the woman should not be more valued than the life of the fetus / Byron White -- Abortion before Roe v. Wade was dangerous / Rachel Benson Gold -- Roe v. Wade has provided advances in public health / Carole Joffe -- The problem of personhood in Roe v. Wade / Caitlin E. Borgmann -- Case overview: Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health (1990). Majority opinion: State laws may require parental notification for minors seeking abortion / Anthony Kennedy -- Dissenting opinion: Parental notification laws are an unjustified intrusion into a private decision / Harry Blackmun -- The results of parental notification laws have been mixed / Kathleen Sylvester -- Teens are adversely affected by parental notification laws / Le Anne Schreiber -- Parental notification laws do little to curb teen abortion / David Whitman -- 505 8 $a Case overview: Planned parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992). Plurality opinion: State laws that restrict abortion are not unconstitutional / Sandra Day O'Conner -- Dissenting opinion: Roe v. Wade should be overturned / William Rehnquist -- The Casey decision is the result of an activist court / Neil Munro -- In devaluing the life of a fetus, Casey paves the way for euthanasia / Charles Colson -- Case overview: Stenberg v. Carhart (Carhart I) (2000). Majority opinion: Physicians and women should make health decisions / Stephen Breyer -- Dissenting opinion: The state has a legitimate interest in protecting fetal life / Clarence Thomas -- Stenberg provides an important step toward the future of states' rights / Michael S. Greve -- Stenberg disregards the life of the fetus / Michael Scaperlanda and John Breen -- Nebraska's ban on partial-birth abortion aims to limit access to abortion / Simon Heller et al. -- Case overview: Gonzales v. Carhart (Carhart II) (2007). Majority opinion: The state's interest in promoting life justifies restricting access to abortion / Anthony Kennedy -- Dissenting opinion: As equal citizens, women must control their reproductive lives / Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- The importance of dilation and extraction to women's health / Stephen Chasen et al. -- Gonzales v. Carhart suggests a strategy for overturning Roe v. Wade / Stephen G. Calabresi -- The pro-choice movement should adopt a social justice platform / Rebecca Tuhus-Dubrow. 650 0 $a Abortion $z United States. 650 0 $a Abortion. 700 1 $a Leverich, Jean. 830 0 $a Issues on trial. 941 $a 4 952 $l SAPG074 $d 20160202061732.0 952 $l N3AX771 $d 20100503150143.0 952 $l UTAX115 $d 20100405100908.0 952 $l UQAX771 $d 20100503145649.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=BA64AC00253811DF9B7CADF9A7D7520A 994 $a 01 $b IWDInitiate Another SILO Locator Search