109 records matched your query
04138aam a2200601 i 4500 001 58920BD0CD6211EE9507C16149ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20240217010049 008 230413t20232023caua b 001 0 eng c 010 $a 2023017623 020 $a 1503636887 020 $a 9781503636880 020 $a 1503632695 020 $a 9781503632691 035 $a (OCoLC)1371014296 040 $a CSt/DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCF $d OCLCO $d SLU $d SILO 042 $a pcc 043 $a n-us--- 050 00 $a KF384 $b .B69 2023 100 1 $a Boyd, Christina L., $e author. 245 10 $a Supreme bias : $b gender and race in U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings / $c Christina L. Boyd, Paul M. Collins, Jr., and Lori A. Ringhand. 264 1 $a Stanford, California : $b Stanford University Press, $c [2023] 300 $a xi, 277 pages : $b illustrations ; $c 24 cm. 520 $a "In Supreme Bias, Christina L. Boyd, Paul M. Collins, Jr., and Lori A. Ringhand, present for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the dynamics of race and gender at the Supreme Court confirmation hearings held before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Drawing on their deep knowledge of the confirmation hearings, as well as rich new qualitative and quantitative evidence, the authors highlight how the women and people of color who have sat before the Committee have faced a significantly different confirmation process than their white, male colleagues. Despite being among the most qualified and well-credentialed lawyers of their respective generations, female nominees and nominees of color face more skepticism of their professional competence, are subjected to stereotype-based questioning, and are more frequently interrupted and described in less positive terms by senators. In addition to revealing the disturbing extent to which race and gender bias exists even at the highest echelon of U.S. legal power, this book also provides concrete suggestions for how that bias can be reduced in the future"-- $c Provided by publisher. 504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index. 505 0 $a Diversifying the federal courts -- The Supreme Court confirmation process -- Theorizing bias in the confirmation hearings -- Professional competence and expertise -- Interruptions -- Language choices -- Gender, race, and the Thomas-Hill and Kavanaugh-Blasey Ford special sessions -- Reflecting and looking forward. 610 10 $a United States. $b Supreme Court $x Selection and appointment. $x Selection and appointment. 610 10 $a United States. $b Committee on the Judiciary $b Senate. $b Committee on the Judiciary 610 17 $a United States. $b Committee on the Judiciary $b Senate. $b Committee on the Judiciary $2 fast 610 17 $a United States. $b Supreme Court $2 fast 650 0 $a Discrimination in justice administration $z United States. 650 0 $a Bias (Law) $z United States. 650 0 $a Race discrimination $x Law and legislation $z United States. 650 0 $a Sex discrimination against women $x Law and legislation $z United States. 650 0 $a Judges $x Selection and appointment $z United States. 650 0 $a Legislative hearings $z United States. 650 6 $a Discrimination dans l'administration de la justice $z Etats-Unis. 650 6 $a Partialite (Droit) $z Etats-Unis. 650 6 $a Commissions parlementaires $x Audiences $z Etats-Unis. 650 7 $a Bias (Law) $2 fast 650 7 $a Discrimination in justice administration $2 fast 650 7 $a Judges $x Selection and appointment $2 fast 650 7 $a Legislative hearings $2 fast 650 7 $a Race discrimination $x Law and legislation $2 fast 650 7 $a Sex discrimination against women $x Law and legislation $2 fast 651 7 $a United States $2 fast 700 1 $a Collins, Paul M., $c Jr. $e author. 700 1 $a Ringhand, Lori A., $e author. 776 08 $i Online version: $a Boyd, Christina L. $t Supreme bias. $d Stanford, California : Stanford University Press, 2023 $z 9781503636897 $w (DLC) 2023017624 941 $a 2 952 $l UQAX771 $d 20240405024601.0 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20240217011939.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=58920BD0CD6211EE9507C16149ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search