145 records matched your query
03535aam a2200301Ii 4500 001 C45850FCC19811EE857C5B5120ECA4DB 003 SILO 005 20240202010025 008 231204t20232023nyuaf e b 001 0deng d 020 $a 1639364919 020 $a 9781639364916 035 $a (OCoLC)1411762655 040 $a GCmBT $b eng $e rda $c CZA $d CZA $d OCLCO $d OCO $d OCLCQ $d JQW $d YDX $d BDX $d TOH $d JTH $d MNN $d LE# $d SILO 043 $a e-uk-en 100 1 $a Murphy, Paul Thomas, $d 1957- $e author. 245 10 $a Falling rocket : $b James Whistler, John Ruskin, and the battle for modern art / $c Paul Thomas Murphy. 250 $a First Pegasus Books cloth edition. 264 2 $a New York : $b Simon and Schuster $c �2023 300 $a 394 pages, 16 unnumbered pages of plates : $b illustrations (chiefly color) ; $c 24 cm 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 325-382) and index. 505 0 $a Whistler's mother -- No wealth but life -- Nocturnes -- Damages -- "Ruskin wouldn't go" -- Whistler v. Ruskin -- The show -- Venice -- La Fortune -- Ghosts. 520 $a "In November 1878, America's greatest painter sued England's greatest critic for a bad review. The painter won--but ruined himself in the process. The painter: James Abbot MacNeill Whistler, whose combination of incredible talent, unflagging energy, and relentless self-promotion had by that time brought him to the very edge of artistic preeminence. The critic: John Ruskin, Slade Professor of Art at Oxford University, whose four-decades' worth of prolific and highly respected literary output on aesthetics had made him England's unchallenged and seemingly unchallengeable arbiter of art. Though Whistler and Ruskin both lived in London and moved in the same artistic world, they had, until June, 1877, managed to remain entirely clear of one another. This was unusual because Whistler had a mercurial temperament, a belligerent personality, and seemed to thrive on opposition: he once challenged a man to a duel because the man accused the painter of sleeping with his wife. (Whistler had, in fact, slept with the man's wife.) That November, John Ruskin walked into the Grosvenor Gallery's new exhibition of art and gazed with horror upon Whistler's Nocturne in Black and Gold: The Falling Rocket. The painting was Whistler's interpretation of a fireworks display at a local pleasure garden. But to Ruskin it was nothing more than a chaotic, incomprehensible mess of bright spots upon dark masses: not art but its antithesis--a disturbing and disgusting assault upon everything he had ever written or taught on the subject. He quickly channeled that anger into a seething review. The internationally-reported, widely discussed, and hugely-entertaining trial that followed was a titanic battle between the opposing ideas and ideals of two larger-than-life personalities. For these two protagonists, Whistler v Ruskin was the battle of a lifetime--or more accurately, a battle of their two lifetimes. Paul Thomas Murphy's Falling Rocket also recounts James Whistler's turbulent but triumphant development from artistic oblivion in the 1880s to artistic deification in the 1890s, and also Ruskin's isolated, befogged, silent final years after his public humiliation"-- $c Provided by publisher. 710 2 $a Simon and Schuster, Inc., $e distributor. 941 $a 3 952 $l YTPG232 $d 20240502011747.0 952 $l CAPH522 $d 20240402011833.0 952 $l TCPG826 $d 20240202011540.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=C45850FCC19811EE857C5B5120ECA4DBInitiate Another SILO Locator Search