Reasoning by consequences : applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions / Flavia Carbonell -- On the Argumentum ad Absurdum in statutory interpretation : its uses and normative significance / Thomas Bustamante -- Why precedent in law (and elsewhere) is not totally (or even substantially) about analogy / Frederick Schauer -- Fallacies in Ad Hominem arguments / Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav, and Lena Wahlberg -- The rule of law and the ideal of a critical discussion / Harm Kloosterhuis -- Strategic maneuvering with the argumentative role of legal principles in the case of the "unworthy spouse" / Eveline T. Feteris -- Legal argumentation and the normativity of legal norms / Carlos Bernal -- Weighing and balancing in the light of deliberation and expression / Bruce Anderson -- Construction or reconstruction? On the function of argumentation in the law / Jaap Hage -- The argument from psychological typology for a mild separation between the context of discovery and the context of justification / Marko Novak -- Constitutive rules and coherence in legal argumentation : the case of extensive and restrictive interpretation / Antonino Rotolo and Corrado Roversi -- Is balancing a method of rational justification sui generis? / Jan Sieckmann -- Arguing on facts : truth, trials and adversary procedures / Giovanni Tuzet.
This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.