The Locator -- [(author = "Rand Corporation")]

1473 records matched your query       


Record 12 | Previous Record | Long Display | Next Record
03383aam a2200529Ii 4500
001 91BB3394664511EDB99D19AA23ECA4DB
003 SILO
005 20221117010035
008 210525s2021    caua     b    000 0 eng d
020    $a 9781977405432
020    $a 1977405436
035    $a (OCoLC)1258707250
040    $a RSM $b eng $e rda $c RSM $d OCLCO $d BDX $d OCLCF $d OCLCO $d YDX $d OCLCO $d YDX $d SILO
043    $a a-iq--- $a a-af--- $a a-iq---
050  4 $a E183.8.I57 $b W38 2021
082 04 $a 355.03109730 $2 23
100 1  $a Watts, Stephen $q (Stephen Baldwin), $e author.
245 10 $a Securing gains in fragile states : $b using U.S. leverage in Iraq, Afghanistan, and beyond / $c Stephen Watts, Jeffrey Martini, Jason H. Campbell, Mark Toukan, Inhyok Kwon.
246 3  $a Using United States leverage in Iraq, Afghanistan, and beyond
264  1 $a Santa Monica, Calif : $b RAND Corporation, $c [2021]
300    $a xxiii, 365 pages : $b illustrations ; $c 23 cm
500    $a "Prepared for the United States Army."
500    $a "RAND Arroyo Center."
504    $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 339-365).
520    $a The U.S. experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan and the resulting U.S. military doctrine emphasize the need for the United States to consolidate the gains it has realized on the battlefield. Recognizing this need, however, is much easier than understanding the measures necessary to succeed. Both U.S. decisionmakers and a variety of analysts have generally agreed that broad-based, inclusive governance and institutionalized capacity-building consistent with the rule of law are the long-term goals for stabilizing fragile states. The conditions under which these goals are realistic and how to realize them are much more contentious. This report describes research intended to advance at least partial answers to these questions, including a framework to help better understand when we expect U.S. leverage to be successful in nudging partners toward better governance practices. While there is no panacea for the difficulties of stabilizing countries after conflicts, this research offers guidance on how the United States might improve the odds of securing such hard-won gains and evidence to suggest that-at least under the right circumstances-it can do so.
530    $a Also available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.
580    $a See also RAND/RR-A250-2.
651  0 $a United States $x Military relations $z Iraq.
651  0 $a United States $x Military relations $z Afghanistan.
650  0 $a Nation-building $z Afghanistan.
650  0 $a Nation-building $z Iraq.
650  0 $a Nation-building $z United States.
650  7 $a Nation-building. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01737474
651  7 $a Afghanistan. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01205406
651  7 $a Iraq. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01205757
651  7 $a United States. $2 fast $0 (OCoLC)fst01204155
700 1  $a Martini, Jeffrey, $e author.
700 1  $a Campbell, Jason H., $e author.
700 1  $a Toukan, Mark, $e author.
700 1  $a Kwon, Inhyok, $e author.
710 2  $a Arroyo Center.
710 2  $a Rand Corporation.
710 1  $a United States. $b Army.
787 08 $i See also: $t Using U.S. leverage to limit instability in fragile states : executive summary $r RAND/RR-A250-2
941    $a 1
952    $l OVUX522 $d 20231117011823.0
956    $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=91BB3394664511EDB99D19AA23ECA4DB

Initiate Another SILO Locator Search

This resource is supported by the Institute of Museum and Library Services under the provisions of the Library Services and Technology Act as administered by State Library of Iowa.