497 records matched your query
03403aam a2200493 a 4500 001 158BCF7E7A8E11E3893C2FCEDAD10320 003 SILO 005 20140111010025 008 110920s2012 enka b 001 0 eng 010 $a 2011039382 020 $a 1107012074 020 $a 9781107012073 035 $a (OCoLC)756837029 040 $a DLC $b eng $c DLC $d UKMGB $d YDXCP $d BDX $d BWX $d IUL $d STF $d CDX $d PUL $d YUS $d OBE $d IOK $d SILO 042 $a pcc 050 00 $a BJ1451 $b .S69 2012 082 00 $a 170.92/2 $2 23 084 $a PHI009000 $2 bisacsh 100 1 $a Stern, Robert, $d 1962- 245 10 $a Understanding moral obligation : $b Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard / $c Robert Stern. 260 $a Cambridge ; $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2012. 300 $a xiv, 277 p. : $b ill. ; $c 24 cm. 490 1 $a Modern European philosophy 520 $a "In many histories of modern ethics, Kant is supposed to have ushered in an anti-realist or constructivist turn by holding that unless we ourselves 'author' or lay down moral norms and values for ourselves, our autonomy as agents will be threatened. In this book, Robert Stern challenges the cogency of this 'argument from autonomy', and claims that Kant never subscribed to it. Rather, it is not value realism but the apparent obligatoriness of morality that really poses a challenge to our autonomy: how can this be accounted for without taking away our freedom? The debate the book focuses on therefore concerns whether this obligatoriness should be located in ourselves (Kant), in others (Hegel) or in God (Kierkegaard). Stern traces the historical dialectic that drove the development of these respective theories, and clearly and sympathetically considers their merits and disadvantages; he concludes by arguing that the choice between them remains open."--Dust jacket. 504 $a Includes bibliographical references (p. 255-272) and index. 505 0 $a Pt. I. Kant. Kant, moral realism, and the argument from autonomy -- The argument from autonomy and the problem of moral obligation -- Kant's solution to the problem of moral obligation -- pt. II. Hegel. Hegel's critique of Kant (via Schiller) -- Hegel's solution to the problem of moral obligation -- pt. III. Kierkegaard. Kierkegaard's critique of Hegel -- Kierkegaard's solution to the problem of moral obligation -- Conclusion : from Kant to Kierkegaard--and back again? 650 0 $a Duty. 650 0 $a Responsibility. 600 10 $a Kant, Immanuel, $d 1724-1804. 600 10 $a Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, $d 1770-1831. 600 10 $a Kierkegaard, Søren, $d 1813-1855. 650 7 $a PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / General. $2 bisacsh 830 0 $a Modern European philosophy. 856 42 $z Additional Information at Google Books $u http://books.google.com/books?isbn=9781107012073 856 42 $3 Cover image $u http://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/12073/cover/9781107012073.jpg 856 42 $3 Contributor biographical information $u http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1117/2011039382-b.html 856 42 $3 Publisher description $u http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1117/2011039382-d.html 941 $a 4 952 $l OVUX522 $d 20180117024052.0 952 $l USUX851 $d 20160826064826.0 952 $l UXAX826 $d 20150514025058.0 952 $l SOAX911 $d 20140111010654.0 956 $a http://locator.silo.lib.ia.us/search.cgi?index_0=id&term_0=158BCF7E7A8E11E3893C2FCEDAD10320 994 $a C0 $b IOKInitiate Another SILO Locator Search